Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 08-29-2006, 04:59 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: Overpair on Paired board - RANT

sam jack not a passive bitch
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08-29-2006, 08:03 PM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: Overpair on Paired board - RANT

[ QUOTE ]
What does Sam Jackson say?

http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/6...eson995he6.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]


just because of this post, I'm changing over to the "raising the flop" class

awesome, Raise that *****
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08-29-2006, 10:50 PM
MATT111 MATT111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Driving sideways on a one way street
Posts: 3,066
Default Re: Overpair on Paired board - RANT

[ QUOTE ]
sam jack not a passive bitch

[/ QUOTE ]

SJ likes money.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08-29-2006, 10:59 PM
Heisenb3rg Heisenb3rg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,733
Default Re: Overpair on Paired board - RANT

[ QUOTE ]
I call this down against an unknown. KK is nearly the same hand as 66 in this situation and I doubt anybody would be arguing so vigorously for aggressive play with 66.

[/ QUOTE ]

Um no it's not.
66 is WAY more vulnerable and much more likely to be outdrawn by a non 9x hand. It's also possible he was passive PF and has a higher PP.

It's no longer WA/WB situation with 66.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08-30-2006, 02:36 AM
Rev. Good Will Rev. Good Will is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: greener pastures
Posts: 2,824
Default Re: Overpair on Paired board - RANT

I hate to bump this from the dark, give everyone mind-aches and get everyone all peeved, but...

This is a really, really good thread. When in this situation, I used to more or less always raise, then treat as most WA/WB and call down, now I'm not too sure about anything anymore.

For now, I might just go for the puss move; just call down some predetermined % of the time with QQ+ in this spot using the random number generator on my wrist(for now, second hand 1-30 means call down [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]). Of course raise/punish all the time with lower pp's than that.

I cut/pasted it into a real reply button for the OP instead of using quick reply just so I can keep it in my favorites (this "flate mode" thing is really cool btw)

miles, I hope this isn't the reason why you hate 2p2

once again, really good thread. I'm gonna dig up that one that's causing all the fuss now [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08-30-2006, 04:32 AM
Spy Dog Spy Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beer tastes good
Posts: 5,193
Default Re: Overpair on Paired board - RANT

For those that don't understand why I said KK is nearly like 66 in this spot:

1) He has a 9x. I have 2 outs either way so it really doesn't matter whether I hold 66 or KK.

2) He has 5x. Well, he has maybe 3 more outs with this hand when I hold 66 vs KK (but it doesn't matter when he holds A5).

3) He has air. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT HOLDING!! I want to play KK passively, just like 66. I want him to keep firing with air. Yes, he has a better chance of drawing out when I have 66, which makes KK superior. However, it doesn't change the way I would play the hand. I never said I have the same equity with 66.

So, for situations 1, 2, and 3 I play 66/KK the same way for the same reasons. Sorry for the confusion.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.