#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
I thought it was a proposed edit of a section of OP. My mistake if it wasn't. Econ_Tim offered no explanation when he posted it. In Mayshaque's attack, it made sense. With the changes OP proposed, it does not.
A much more interesting debate for those in the know is 1 mod vs. 2 mods. I've seen both but have mixed feelings on them. A 2 mod onslaught can be tricky to pull off, but effective if executed properly. However, if the leading mod isn't protected adequately, the results can be disasterous. Is the risk worth the potential reward? |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
[ QUOTE ]
Is the risk worth the potential reward? [/ QUOTE ] It all depends on the value of low points. If they are negligible then this is certainly the way to go. However, it often comes down to the low points in the end. It's a bitch like that. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
[ QUOTE ]
I thought it was a proposed edit of a section of OP. My mistake if it wasn't. Econ_Tim offered no explanation when he posted it. In Mayshaque's attack, it made sense. With the changes OP proposed, it does not. A much more interesting debate for those in the know is 1 mod vs. 2 mods. I've seen both but have mixed feelings on them. A 2 mod onslaught can be tricky to pull off, but effective if executed properly. However, if the leading mod isn't protected adequately, the results can be disasterous. Is the risk worth the potential reward? [/ QUOTE ] sorry. just an idea i was toying with but didn't have time to flesh out. maybe someone else can carry it further. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
Is the #44 placement a preemptive defense of your apex quadrant? It seems a little presumptuous given the presence of more enticing vulnerabilities elsewhere (84?). That's all I can figure, and if so, why the 32-array? I've never done a 101-man before, as you can probably tell.
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
GUYS STOP RESPONDING TO THIS THREAD SERIOUSLY
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
[ QUOTE ]
GUYS STOP RESPONDING TO THIS THREAD SERIOUSLY [/ QUOTE ] quite an ironic post..wouldn't you say? Seriously though, its become quite clear that some of you do not enjoy onslaughts...thats fine. But I just don't understand how hard it is to NOT click on the threads that don't interest you. Whats the big deal where people need to come into threads and bash what they don't enjoy when other people are clearly fans? |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
Didn't you make this same exact post a couple months back, or am I just having weird deja vu?
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] GUYS STOP RESPONDING TO THIS THREAD SERIOUSLY [/ QUOTE ] quite an ironic post..wouldn't you say? Seriously though, its become quite clear that some of you do not enjoy onslaughts...thats fine. But I just don't understand how hard it is to NOT click on the threads that don't interest you. Whats the big deal where people need to come into threads and bash what they don't enjoy when other people are clearly fans? [/ QUOTE ] GUYS STOP TAKING THINGS I SAY SERIOUSLY |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
[ QUOTE ]
Didn't you make this same exact post a couple months back, or am I just having weird deja vu? [/ QUOTE ] I actually did make a similar post, but some idiots ruined the thread and I think it eventually got deleted. But it actually turned out to be a good thing because I've actually changed up my 101 man a little bit and I think its much improved now. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a 101 man onslaught
Great thread. Keep up the good work, Assani.
|
|
|