|
|
#92
09-28-2007, 08:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400k hand graph
ATTENTION: I have detected the presence of swongs in my graph.
 Also I'm only on track for like 190K after 400K hands. OP, what am I doing wrong?  Is it that I need to limp in 4% more hands and play more passively? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Thanks for your advice! 
|
|
#95
09-28-2007, 09:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 400k hand graph
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Imsakidd: I'm not saying it isn't a good brag in making money, I'm saying this guy is the opposite of special. You see his location saying Sweden? You know, there are swedish forums, and thus I know this guy, and yes, he is the biggest nit ever, playing on very soft sites, it's really nothing that impresses me about this except for his stamina to put in hands. He would get killed on tougher sites. Even so, congratulations on your results of course, I'm really not taking that away from you, I'm just trying to explain that these thats are really, really non even close to optimal, and that you are winning from really bad players, not from decent players. Got it? [/ QUOTE ] Being an average player killing fish > being a talented player peddling a small edge/winrate against decent players. Good table selection is good poker. [/ QUOTE ] good table selection is good financial management. it is NOT good poker. the main problem that can face someone like OP is that if the games dry up to the point where super soft games like the ones he obviously plays in dont exist anymore then he is pretty much screwed as he will get eaten alive in tough lineups with those stats. i mean credit where credit's due, this is a great brag, but its probably a good idea to keep things in perspective...being a great player killing fish AND decent regulars>being an average played killing fish and getting owned by decent regulars.
|
|
#96
09-28-2007, 09:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 400k hand graph
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Imsakidd: I'm not saying it isn't a good brag in making money, I'm saying this guy is the opposite of special. You see his location saying Sweden? You know, there are swedish forums, and thus I know this guy, and yes, he is the biggest nit ever, playing on very soft sites, it's really nothing that impresses me about this except for his stamina to put in hands. He would get killed on tougher sites. Even so, congratulations on your results of course, I'm really not taking that away from you, I'm just trying to explain that these thats are really, really non even close to optimal, and that you are winning from really bad players, not from decent players. Got it? [/ QUOTE ] Being an average player killing fish > being a talented player peddling a small edge/winrate against decent players. Good table selection is good poker. [/ QUOTE ] good table selection is good financial management. it is NOT good poker. the main problem that can face someone like OP is that if the games dry up to the point where super soft games like the ones he obviously plays in dont exist anymore then he is pretty much screwed as he will get eaten alive in tough lineups with those stats. i mean credit where credit's due, this is a great brag, but its probably a good idea to keep things in perspective...being a great player killing fish AND decent regulars>being an average played killing fish and getting owned by decent regulars. [/ QUOTE ] What makes you think that I'm getting owned by any of the regulars? I counted my average result against the 13 players I've played most hands against at 500NL+ and had a total result of +$5220. These are all decent regulars.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
