|
|
#91
09-10-2007, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
why not jay? i figured it was unlikely he had me beat, KJ got there, but thats it. JT probably would have raised the turn.
|
|
#92
09-10-2007, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
[ QUOTE ]
i knew that was a decent board to float on, and with my knowledge that you are fully capable of it do you think cr > betting turn in the situation i was in? [/ QUOTE ] yeah checkraise is probably better. i wouldn't beat yourself up for not doing it though it's a pretty sick play, and i often have a mediocre hand here with showdown value and check behind anyway. edit: quoted post i was responding to to make it more clear
|
|
#93
09-10-2007, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
His most likely hand here is like a midpair, flush draw or Jx. He probably won't call this river bet with J9 or midpairs, probably folds QJ and likely doesn't have AJ given preflop (not sure on this one). I assume he can definitely have KJ and sometimes JT, sets - its definitely not a horrible board for him to slowplay on. Just seems like betting (especially 3/4 pot) doesn't have too much value vs his calling range, and I think there is an awful lot of merit in c/c (especially given Seabeast's comment that he was going to bet like every river when checked to).
|
|
#94
09-10-2007, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
[ QUOTE ]
yeah checkraise is probably better. [/ QUOTE ] I don't see the value in a check-raise tbh unless you like making big calls in spots like this [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] I think a fake blocker or a check/call are much better tbh.
|
|
#95
09-10-2007, 10:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
i think there are more bluff catchers in his range then value betting/bluffing ones. i doubt his double floating frequency is very high (???), plus it looks like a good card for me to bluff in his eyes.
|
|
#96
09-10-2007, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yeah checkraise is probably better. [/ QUOTE ] I don't see the value in a check-raise tbh unless you like making big calls in spots like this [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] I think a fake blocker or a check/call are much better tbh. [/ QUOTE ] boards gotten drawy now the T came, he's probably betting alot of Js to charge for draws and i can easily rep one.
|
|
#97
09-10-2007, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
[ QUOTE ]
i think there are more bluff catchers in his range then value betting/bluffing ones. i doubt his double floating frequency is very high (???), plus it looks like a good card for me to bluff in his eyes. [/ QUOTE ] hmmm good response (I think [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]). Interesting hand anyway.
|
|
#98
09-10-2007, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yeah checkraise is probably better. [/ QUOTE ] I don't see the value in a check-raise tbh unless you like making big calls in spots like this [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] I think a fake blocker or a check/call are much better tbh. [/ QUOTE ] boards gotten drawy now the T came, he's probably betting alot of Js to charge for draws and i can easily rep one. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, my bad thought you were talking about the river.
|
|
#99
09-10-2007, 10:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
oh ok, that would be sick! lol
|
|
#100
09-10-2007, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Well: SEABEAST
appreciate the comments seabeast! (why did you delete your last post?)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
