#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reporters are dumb
hmmmmmm.... i remember this coming up before....april biotches
[ QUOTE ] The only thing I wasn't aware of is that it bleeds 3x slower. I can believe slightly slower, but 3x slower? I'd like to see studies of that. Still, that is not the reason why you pay $5 to fill your tires. The reason is water vapor. [/ QUOTE ] This is still incorrect. Any reputable tire shop will have an oil lubricated air compressor, followed by a coelescing filter (to remove the oil carryover and particles between 10 and 1 micron that the generic intake filter to the compressor didn't catch) and then followed by a refridgerated dryer. This dryer removes the moisture in the air down to a 35 degree F pressure dewpoint (at least 100 psi). There is very little moisture left after that, especially because the air in your tires is only at ~30 psi, not 100 (the pressure where the 35 degree dewpoint was achieved, and BTW most shops do it at 150 psi). Any nitrogen generator that a tire shop has is just going to be passing this already dry and oilfree air through some more filters and then through a membrane that 'filters' out the oxygen. If you were to fill your tires up with the shop air, vs. the nitrogen, you will not see a noticable difference in moisture content. If you go to a small machine that accepts quarters, all bets are off. You will be taking the humidity of the air at ~14.5 psi atmospheric, and pressurizing it to ~45 psi absolute (gauge pressure is absolute - atmospheric, so ~30 psi in this case, and that's what you read w/ a pressure guage!), effectivly raising the relative humidity. This is something that is worth avoiding, even if it takes $5. Questions? Comments? Since I have already gone this far, might as well go all out. [ QUOTE ] Don't forget that Oxygen is explosive, causing more frequent blow-outs. Also, watching the Oxygen network makes me poop. [/ QUOTE ] You are missing the hydro-carbon (or just hydrogen) part of the equation. Lighting a match around gasoline is bad. Around Oxygen, not bad. If you were joking, PM me, I'll edit this out cause I don't like looking dumb. [ QUOTE ] Nitrogen is an inert gas, so there are no safety or environmental issues. [/ QUOTE ] Noble gases are the only true inert gases, N2 is only 'molecularly' inert. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reporters are dumb
This thread is really, really stupid.
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reporters are dumb
i do my best [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
thread killer
[ QUOTE ]
This is still incorrect. [/ QUOTE ] No, it's not. In race cars water vapor is the main reason. I'm a big F1 fan and that's how I first learned about the use of nitrogen in tires. They don't have tires long enough to worry about oxygen corrosion or leakage. Although I will admit that the small difference between the nitrogen and the dry air in F1 tires may be merely academic. I don't know, but that's the official reason. Maybe a tank of N2 is easier to carry than a dryer. With planes and trucks it's a different story as corrosion is a factor among other things. Here are a few peer review journals to prove it: General analysis and proof that nitrogen has less water than regular air: http://www.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.p...p;setcookie=yes This is a big reason for trucks: http://www.branick.com/pdf/nitrogen_age_slower.pdf Here is a article on why airplanes use it: http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/...ps&gifs=yes |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reporters are dumb
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wacki, do you feel the author of this story is dumb, and if so why? [/ QUOTE ] The reporter is dumb because he should of [/ QUOTE ] Should have! ARRRGGHH! |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reporters are dumb
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The reporter is dumb because he should of [/ QUOTE ] Should have! ARRRGGHH! [/ QUOTE ] Ya, old habits die hard, thanks for reminding me. Should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have, should have. Hope that fixes it. |
|
|