|
|
#21
11-30-2007, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 interesting $400 PLO8 hands
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973643
pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc kd qs jh - ah 2h 5c 6s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 62 167 499 0 96 371 9 0.214 Qs Kc Kd Jh 172 468 198 0 0 0 0 0.480 6s 5c Ah 2h 27 31 635 0 371 96 9 0.305 Ok, minor difference here, still sucks IMO. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973645 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc kd qs jh - ah 4d 3c 8s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 69 206 454 6 126 0 387 0.410 Qs Kc Kd Jh 133 451 215 0 0 0 0 0.438 8s 3c 4d Ah 2 3 657 6 0 48 387 0.151 Little better here but still sucky. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973648 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc kd qs jh - ah 3d 3c 8s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 216 221 445 0 521 0 9 0.574 Qs Kc Kd Jh 102 408 258 0 0 0 0 0.383 8s 3c 3d Ah 16 37 629 0 0 120 9 0.043 Now we go from 50/50 to 60/40. Still pretty much the best you're gonna see imo. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973649 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc 8d qs jh - ah 2d 3c 8s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 97 230 436 0 158 355 0 0.309 Qs Kc 8d Jh 102 331 335 0 0 0 0 0.325 8s 3c 2d Ah 67 105 561 0 355 58 0 0.366 OK, if 2 pr was Dave's read then he is still a dog with no fold equity. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973655 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc 8d qs jh -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 820 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 309 309 511 0 630 0 0 0.593 Qs Kc 8d Jh 157 511 309 0 0 0 0 0.407 Again, 60/40 at best. I don't see this ('this' being the correction of my earlier moronity) changing my opinion on call/fold. The interesting thing is how the spade draw only adds 10% equity to the first couple of sims. To be a fav in this spot vs anyone reasonable you need to have the only live low draw, which I don't see happening often enough to be profitable. 
|
|
#22
11-30-2007, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 interesting $400 PLO8 hands
[ QUOTE ]
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973643 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc kd qs jh - ah 2h 5c 6s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 62 167 499 0 96 371 9 0.214 Qs Kc Kd Jh 172 468 198 0 0 0 0 0.480 6s 5c Ah 2h 27 31 635 0 371 96 9 0.305 Ok, minor difference here, still sucks IMO. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973645 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc kd qs jh - ah 4d 3c 8s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 69 206 454 6 126 0 387 0.410 Qs Kc Kd Jh 133 451 215 0 0 0 0 0.438 8s 3c 4d Ah 2 3 657 6 0 48 387 0.151 Little better here but still sucky. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973648 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc kd qs jh - ah 3d 3c 8s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 216 221 445 0 521 0 9 0.574 Qs Kc Kd Jh 102 408 258 0 0 0 0 0.383 8s 3c 3d Ah 16 37 629 0 0 120 9 0.043 Now we go from 50/50 to 60/40. Still pretty much the best you're gonna see imo. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973649 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc 8d qs jh - ah 2d 3c 8s -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 666 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 97 230 436 0 158 355 0 0.309 Qs Kc 8d Jh 102 331 335 0 0 0 0 0.325 8s 3c 2d Ah 67 105 561 0 355 58 0 0.366 OK, if 2 pr was Dave's read then he is still a dog with no fold equity. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3973655 pokenum -o8 as 9s 4h 5h - kc 8d qs jh -- 8c ks 3s Omaha Hi/Low 8-or-better: 820 enumerated boards containing Ks 3s 8c cards scoop HIwin HIlos HItie LOwin LOlos LOtie EV As 9s 5h 4h 309 309 511 0 630 0 0 0.593 Qs Kc 8d Jh 157 511 309 0 0 0 0 0.407 Again, 60/40 at best. I don't see this ('this' being the correction of my earlier moronity) changing my opinion on call/fold. The interesting thing is how the spade draw only adds 10% equity to the first couple of sims. To be a fav in this spot vs anyone reasonable you need to have the only live low draw, which I don't see happening often enough to be profitable. [/ QUOTE ] The way I read this, it is still a borderline decision. This would be dependent on the style you were playing and what range you think people would be shoving with.
|
|
#23
11-30-2007, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 interesting $400 PLO8 hands
Sorry can't avoid mentioning pre-flop selection.
Interesting predicaments. Hand 1: Shouldn't have been in the pot period much less call a re-raise but what's done is done. But since you're in. I like the pot bet on flop but MP2 another limper / caller of massive preflop raise is the aggressor here. 78 unlikely for the made st8 (not totally out as he made an isolation play to move Button out) but I suspect that MP2 might have AQKJ for a massive re-draw or Ax10 10. You left out what the Button did. Two opponents or one. Eh, either way I would fold. Hand 2: Love the pockets. I would have re-raised on flop - don't get greedy isolate UTG - or maybe take it down now. You have nut flush draw and decent low cards. At this point there are no st8 draws. What a sweet flop for your hand. The all-in and re-raises are often A2-ers (maybe a set but silly re-raises with lows and flush draws possibilities). So PUSH PUSH PUSH. My two cents. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
|
#24
11-30-2007, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 interesting $400 PLO8 hands
A little more thought on hand 2>
I think you have to assume that UTG has a high hand that will beat you unless you hit your flush AND I would suspect that your low-- if it comes probably is not good-- and even if it is good against UTG, it might not come. I think you have to treat this hand almost as you would a high only hand, and I think UTG has practically priced you out of the hand. Certainly forgivable if you call, but I think fold is probably more correct.
|
|
#26
11-30-2007, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 interesting $400 PLO8 hands
Hmmm... good point, about being priced out given that flop bet was just cold called instead of being re-raised.
Preflop raiser did pot bet flop - Some people bet their A2 draws too heavily though. As you and Dave mentioned -- probably AA2x. In this hand I'm not really worried about UTG's pot bet per se. This is why I advocate raising this flop such that BB is priced out to ensure iffy backup low cards odds increase. So, in retrospect, given the way it was bet a fold is probably best but if a re-raise was made by Hero a call is justified. I suspect that the BB is the one with pocket Kings for trips as he did a check raise all -in.
|
|
#27
12-02-2007, 03:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 interesting $400 PLO8 hands
Hand 1: I misread this one the first time I looked...I think with you betting into the MP2 and he raises that big(and he wasn't the preflop raiser) you're in deep [censored]...Would your opponent play a mid-wrap?? I can't see any reason to play this one any further...Just doing some gorilla math in my head, I think the best you could hope for here is to be even money and I don't think your low is worth [censored] against what his range is...Hell 65 has you beat for low...
Hand 2: Toughie...I think Mend said it was mood dependent...I'd say the same thing...If I felt like gambooling I'd shove here...I'd have to be running like the sun to do that though...I could really see UTG popping it to protect AA2/AA4/AA5 against what he perceives to be a flush draw with no A2 by you...Tough spot, but I think you gotta muck it...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
