|
View Poll Results: Idiotic or Genius? | |||
Idiotic | 14 | 93.33% | |
Genius | 1 | 6.67% | |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
[ QUOTE ]
also btw, you guys are the ones claiming a benefit of transfats. how can I prove a neg? I mean showing trans and non trans chips cost the same is best I can do really. [/ QUOTE ] Am I correct in inferring that you believe the SF solution doesn't go far enough, and that you support an outright ban, not only in restaurants but in all food of any kind? natedogg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>Am I correct in inferring that you believe the SF solution doesn't go far enough, and that you support an outright ban, not only in restaurants but in all food of any kind?
natedogg </pre><hr /> well basically I was just responding to this subpoint below. [ QUOTE ] MisterJed newbie Reged: 01/06/05 Posts: 33 Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too [Re: natedogg] #13194503 - 11/30/07 10:35 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply Quick Reply The Trans-fat argument bugs me because there is no value out of trans-fats. Banning them is perfectly reasonable to me. Something like marijuana is different to me because it is valuable to some people. What good comes from trans-fats? Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator vhawk01 Carpal \'Tunnel Reged: 02/08/06 Posts: 9098 Loc: GHoFFANMWYD Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too [Re: MisterJed] #13194528 - 11/30/07 10:38 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply Quick Reply Quote: The Trans-fat argument bugs me because there is no value out of trans-fats. Banning them is perfectly reasonable to me. Something like marijuana is different to me because it is valuable to some people. What good comes from trans-fats? Uhhh...what? Marijuana doesnt have any value for me. I mean, it makes me feel good, I guess. So do trans-fats, or at least, I claim they do so go [censored] yourself. Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator TomCollins Political Prisoner Reged: 07/28/03 Posts: 7517 Loc: Approving of Iron's Moderation Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too [Re: MisterJed] #13194602 - 11/30/07 10:44 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply Quick Reply Quote: The Trans-fat argument bugs me because there is no value out of trans-fats. Banning them is perfectly reasonable to me. Something like marijuana is different to me because it is valuable to some people. What good comes from trans-fats? If they have no benefit, then why would anyone voluntarily choose them over the alternative? Seems to be there is a benefit, you just couldn't wrap your mind around it. [/ QUOTE ] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
also mr. dogg, I'll address your joke post.
[ QUOTE ] Also, what if you don't like my reason? My reason is that I think foods cooked in transfats taste better. not true, or rather a subjective placebo type effect if you really believe it which you probably don't My other reason is that I'm afraid of real butter. irrational My other reason is that my priest told me jesus wants me to eat transfats. not true My other reason is that the foods are cheaper and last longer in the box so I can store them in my winter cabin.while shelf life is extended, it doesn't make them long term storable My other reason is that I like to make nannies get their panties in a bunch knowing that I'm enjoying my french fries.irrational [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|