![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just want to get some other perspectives on this. I've logged about 25k hands at FTP 25NL, and having played around 1k hands on Stars, it seems to be a bit softer. Anyone else notice this, or perhaps the opposite?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<3 stars
but seriously, table select and any site will be soft |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm really bad, I need fishy players to win.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bodog
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
move down and learn how to play poker then
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
try the Internet Bet League, i heard its realy soft ther
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At least you can datamine on FT. I am doomswitched on FT imo so stars is better.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't get PokerAce Hud to work at Full Tilt and I dunno why.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what about rakeback vs FPP at micros ?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think rakeback+datamining make FTP a better choice.
|
![]() |
|
|