![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Playing 6-handed 0.5/1.0 NL. Villain is 27/12 with AF of 1.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com Button ($260.80) SB <font color="#A500AF">(Villain)</font> ($99) Hero ($100) UTG ($141.95) MP ($90.15) Preflop: Hero is BB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls $1, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB <font color="#A500AF">(Villain)</font> completes, Hero checks. Flop: ($3) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Villain bets $2</font>, Hero calls $2, MP folds. Turn: ($7) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Villain checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3</font>, Villain calls $3. River: ($13) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Villain bets $93 (All-In)</font>, Hero folds. Final Pot: $106 I don't see him making this bet with just a 7. Even if he does, I'm not giving up too much considering we'd be maxing the rake just to split a $12 pot. It does not make sense for an outright bluff. I think I just have to put him on 76 here and fold, right? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Call, please.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dont think you have to put him on 76.. He could have any 7 or he could have a straight and jsut doesnt believe you.. doubt that but maybe... i think i call here
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you wanna be a pussy you can say you've only got 6$ invested and fold.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
but that would be dumb.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fold is good.
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 45 games 0.005 secs 9,000 games/sec Board: 7s 3d 3s 7c 6h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 45.556% 00.00% 45.56% 0 20.50 { 9h7d } Hand 1: 54.444% 08.89% 45.56% 4 20.50 { 33, A7s, K7s, Q7s, J7s, T7s, 97s, 87s, 72s+, A7o, K7o, Q7o, J7o, T7o, 97o, 87o, 72o+ } --- 44 games 0.005 secs 8,800 games/sec Board: 7s 3d 3s 7c 6h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 46.591% 00.00% 46.59% 0 20.50 { 9h7d } Hand 1: 53.409% 06.82% 46.59% 3 20.50 { A7s, K7s, Q7s, J7s, T7s, 97s, 87s, 72s+, A7o, K7o, Q7o, J7o, T7o, 97o, 87o, 72o+ } --- 8.89% you lose 93$, average loss 8.2$, 92% you win 6$. If he is pushing a 3, then it changes, but I doubt it with an aggression factor of 1. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jesus, call. Theres all sorts of hands you beat (3x, 66, 54), and the way he played this looks super donkish.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This was kind of my thinking. Also even if I call and split, we'd be maxing the rake at $3, meaning I only net $4.50 from a split instead of $6.
And he's more likely to be shoving like this with the 76 than with any other 7x combination. Since a 7x would be trying to get value from a 3 or straight. While 76 is trying to get value from any 7x. I don't think this was a "donk" move. I have over 1000 hands against this opponent and show him as a slight winner. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Call. Tight and loose don't matter for reads, nor does aggression factor. You just can't give credit for the two hands that beat you when you have a full house(3-3/6-7). Not at these stakes anyway.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are we under the impression that there is a 0% chance that we win outright? I have seen a lot of bad players and a bad player could overplay a 3. He could have 37, 66, 36 as well as a straight or a badly played overpair.
|
![]() |
|
|