|
View Poll Results: RB | |||
W. Parker | 11 | 52.38% | |
R. Brown | 4 | 19.05% | |
B. Jacobs | 6 | 28.57% | |
C. Buckhalter | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
Bump to see if villain showed up with 44
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
tbh nielso, i can't think of a person on this entire forum more intellectually dishonest than you.
just stating what your image is here |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
[ QUOTE ]
tbh nielso, i can't think of a person on this entire forum more intellectually dishonest than you. just stating what your image is here [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
Whoa.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
From every post being about how you played it a hand in a non std way (yet brilliantly) to using your blog as a cite in politics forum... i just can't think of anyone else who pulls this kind of crap week in week out
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
um, raise somewhere. this is so so gross. how could you ever think just calling the river would be ok? this guy raised UTG then fired 3 streets, his range includes all kinds of stuff you beat that isn't folding.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
[ QUOTE ]
euh super easy shove why can't he valuebet worse? he's never folding a made hand when he gets like 90:300 Board: Tc 2h 9d Qc 4h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 46.429% 46.43% 00.00% 13 0.00 { QQ+, TT-99, AQs, KJs } Hand 1: 53.571% 53.57% 00.00% 15 0.00 { 2c2s } AQs = discounting AQ by a lot and this is pretty much the absolute worst case scenario for us KJs has to be discounted bc of preflop (and he might have QTs too if he plays KJs) and sets have to be discounted because imho he valuebets them harder [/ QUOTE ] kaby - u want to be ahead of his CALLING RANGE more than 50% |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] euh super easy shove why can't he valuebet worse? he's never folding a made hand when he gets like 90:300 Board: Tc 2h 9d Qc 4h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 46.429% 46.43% 00.00% 13 0.00 { QQ+, TT-99, AQs, KJs } Hand 1: 53.571% 53.57% 00.00% 15 0.00 { 2c2s } AQs = discounting AQ by a lot and this is pretty much the absolute worst case scenario for us KJs has to be discounted bc of preflop (and he might have QTs too if he plays KJs) and sets have to be discounted because imho he valuebets them harder [/ QUOTE ] kaby - u want to be ahead of his CALLING RANGE more than 50% [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] everything that bets the river that isn't a complete bluff is calling a shove wth he will get 90:500 odds .................. [/ QUOTE ] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
Shove the river... with that pot hes calling with a lot that you beat
Uncle R is one of the better players but will call to light on the river |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
Bottom set is better than top set so SHOVE RIVER
|
|
|