|
View Poll Results: Idiotic or Genius? | |||
Idiotic | 14 | 93.33% | |
Genius | 1 | 6.67% | |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, in this case they take the right approach. article Restaurants which are certified by the city to be "trans fat free" will get a nice pretty certificate to post in their window. So, my question for the nannies is, how hard was that? [/ QUOTE ] Second, that idea never occurred to us. Our bad. Please forward this thread to the City of New York. Thanks in advance. [/ QUOTE ] The sad thing is I can't tell if this is sincere or not. Since this alternative approach was actually discussed *at length* in the original transfat ban thread, I think it may be a joke. In which case, I'd still love to hear why banning is preferable to informing. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if people are that unwilling to entertain a solution unless government approves of it first. Suddenly it's a viable government solution, because govt chose that solution. natedogg |
|
|