|
View Poll Results: Would you be very likely to play in this Aussie Style KOTKP? | |||
Yes - and Im close to Aussies timezone | 5 | 33.33% | |
Yes - but Im American or Canadian and I might be drunk | 3 | 20.00% | |
Yes - but I live in a place that lets me use the other Yes answers | 0 | 0% | |
Maybe - I live on the planet earth | 7 | 46.67% | |
No | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Neo-Atheism The Way to Go? [Poll]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I agree with Bill Haywood on pretty much every point he has made so far. Many of you are acting like hardcore theists were well-educated and rational adults when their beliefs were formed. In fact, many theists were born into their religion or converted after major life trauma. It is often an integral part of how they understand and parse the world. I don't know the best way to handle these people or engage in debate with them, but I'm am fairly sure it is not ridicule and disdain. All that does is make the debate more contentious and forces people to dig their heels in. Should we challenge their arguments? Most certainly. Should we mock them? No. How does that solve anything? [/ QUOTE ] Really? Well thats basically our entire approach to stop smoking, and it seems to be doing ok. I mean, sure, maybe 5% is based on education and providing alternatives but most of it is just based on shame and ridicule and pariahism. [/ QUOTE ] This is a false analogy. Nobody really disputes the fact that cigarettes are bad for you. And you're saying only 5% is based on education, but that is just wrong. We wouldn't mock and shun smokers if damn near everyone wasn't already educated about the perils of smoking. If you know a theist who knows that his beliefs are illogical and/or ridiculous, I would say that mocking is not a bad option. |
|
|