#1
|
|||
|
|||
3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
These are non-turbos so you have lots of time to pick your spots. The first one I really thought about calling for hypothetical stack size reasons. The 2nd one I did call for that reason. The third I thought was a clear +ev push but I thought it would be better to wait for a better spot. Any thoughts?
PokerStars Game #13549324944: Tournament #68724921, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2007/11/29 - 19:39:04 (ET) Table '68724921 1' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: neilyoung (1943 in chips) Seat 2: dykes_80 (455 in chips) Seat 3: GoHabs! (597 in chips) Seat 4: Quirkey (2560 in chips) Seat 5: eidorbm (1515 in chips) is sitting out Seat 6: MartyJr2 (1220 in chips) Seat 7: DMACM (1560 in chips) Seat 8: Kaspa233 (2405 in chips) Seat 9: radfrobot (1245 in chips) DMACM: posts small blind 50 Kaspa233: posts big blind 100 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to DMACM [Qs 5d] radfrobot: folds neilyoung: folds dykes_80: raises 355 to 455 and is all-in GoHabs!: calls 455 Quirkey: folds eidorbm: folds MartyJr2: folds DMACM: shouldve called PokerStars Game #13549587914: Tournament #68724761, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/11/29 - 19:53:03 (ET) Table '68724761 1' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 2: ShrkScopeDis (1200 in chips) Seat 3: DMACM (3595 in chips) Seat 6: kjskriss (870 in chips) Seat 7: jgorman85 (3305 in chips) Seat 8: timmy2heh (1740 in chips) Seat 9: Hold'emSarge (2790 in chips) ShrkScopeDis: posts small blind 75 DMACM: posts big blind 150 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to DMACM [5h 9s] kjskriss: raises 720 to 870 and is all-in jgorman85: folds timmy2heh: folds Hold'emSarge: folds ShrkScopeDis: raises 330 to 1200 and is all-in DMACM: calls 1050 PokerStars Game #13549768128: Tournament #68724761, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2007/11/29 - 20:02:42 (ET) Table '68724761 1' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 3: DMACM (3770 in chips) Seat 6: kjskriss (1595 in chips) Seat 7: jgorman85 (4655 in chips) Seat 9: Hold'emSarge (3480 in chips) DMACM: posts small blind 100 kjskriss: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to DMACM [2d Td] jgorman85: folds Hold'emSarge: folds DMACM: folds |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
1: fold
2: shark has at least A high 3: fold. i like that. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
[ QUOTE ]
3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run [/ QUOTE ] You did it! You've just defied mathematics and stated the impossible! They all look like folds to me except 3rd one could be fine to shove. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
first 2 are soooo fist pump folds. 3rd is a shove, but can be neg ev depending on a v loose range.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
[ QUOTE ]
first 2 are soooo fist pump folds. 3rd is a shove, but can be neg ev depending on a v loose range. [/ QUOTE ] how about -EV due to future hands with a bigger stack in position against him, rather than a loose range. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
block theory!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 decisions I thought were -ev but good in the long run
Hand 1, your five is definitely live, gotta call.
Hand 2, both cards live, 3 way pot, str8 possibilities, getting at least 2-1, easy easy call. Suited broadway, how can you fold hand 3?!?! |
|
|