#1
|
|||
|
|||
The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
The great dominic parillo has just released some groundbreaking evidence about sngs, and how his brand new theory of "expected" EV relates to them. Some might remember my post about the great dominic parillo, which was posted a few days after he released his first theory titled, "the theory of duality".
Mr. Parillo adds to his duality theory, with emphasis on what he coins "expected EV". Most think this is sort of repetative b/c EV obv. stands for expected value, so the term actually reads expected expected value. A grammar specialist dominic is not, so bear with the nonesense term while i go onto explaining HIS THEORY for the FIRST TIME in an stt forum. the theory of "Expected EV" states that a regular to the stt comm. cannnot control what he/she expects the outcome to be in a particular hand or situation. Stated differently, even if a decision is +EV, it doesnt necessary mean the decision is +EEV. This is because the expectation is not clear untill all cards are faceup and betting is done. Keeping EEV in mind will help out ALOT with push/fold and in particular icm... remember tho, as the games becomes increasingly harder to beat - keep in mind that the games arent just being filled with regulars, they are being filled with regulars who were blessed to read any of dominic parillo's stt's theorys. questions are welcome |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
Didn't really think it was funny.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
no joke lego, dominic is a theorirst and this is one which relates to stt's.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
For those of you that want to vomit and kill a cat every time fisheater posts on 2p2, cliff notes of this "theory post":
"Be results oriented". Take the advice or leave it. Thanks for the contribution fisheater, now please go do something less wasteful of our time. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
Dominic Parillo is fisheater11's alter ego. My first clue was that they share similar grammatical shortcomings.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
I don't know why people get all up in his beeswax. The last many posts from OP has been like this:
*** You are ignoring this user *** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
[ QUOTE ]
Dominic Parillo is fisheater11's alter ego. My first clue was that they share similar grammatical shortcomings. [/ QUOTE ] LOL |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
lol oh slim is going to love this
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
i'm pretty sure your logical abilities are -EEEEEEEEV OP.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The dominic parillo theory of expected EV in STT\'s.
im not great at stts, but better than ~85% of 'solid' 2+2ers here, and dominic parillo himself could be congratted for my marginal success.
|
|
|