#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
CO has open min raised from LP a few times already. The BTN is unknown. I've been aggressive but not out of line. Is this good or bad?
Full Tilt Poker No Limit Holdem Tournament Blinds: t150/t300 (Ante: t25) 9 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: t4495 UTG+1: t4015 MP1: t21690 MP2: t22511 MP3: t3102 CO: t6000 Button: t6160 SB: t13595 Hero: t7113 Pre-flop: (9 players) Hero is BB with 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5 folds, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to t600</font>, Button calls t600 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t1275)</font>, SB folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises all-in t7088</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
If CO has been doing it frequently AND you's seen BTN call before (not necessarily CO, but just anyone) then I like it.
If BTN is a known player, not so much. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
God this is so much better with a hand that has some sort of equity when called.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
[ QUOTE ]
God this is so much better with a hand that has some sort of equity when called. [/ QUOTE ] Well, yeah, but if CO has been continually min-raising and BTNs chips in there too it's a great spot regardless of cards, but it still all comes down to your read on BTN's flat-call so it's tough for us to say. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
[ QUOTE ]
God this is so much better with a hand that has some sort of equity when called. [/ QUOTE ] Thats why you do it when he won't call, like this hand. nh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] God this is so much better with a hand that has some sort of equity when called. [/ QUOTE ] Well, yeah, but if CO has been continually min-raising and BTNs chips in there too it's a great spot regardless of cards, but it still all comes down to your read on BTN's flat-call so it's tough for us to say. [/ QUOTE ] BTN was relatively new to the table and hadn't been very active that's why I didn't have much of a read on him. So, with a solid read on CO but nothing on BTN, is this good or bad? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
Is it bad that this never even crosses my mind? I see 82o and auto-click fold... I would pull this with some kind of suited connector, this just seems bad to me.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
agree with pudge even a hand like acerag suited would be much better to do this with. Or if you were a little shallower so you were risking less but had basically the same amount of FE then this would be better, but I dont think this is +EV
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
[ QUOTE ]
agree with pudge even a hand like acerag suited would be much better to do this with. Or if you were a little shallower so you were risking less but had basically the same amount of FE then this would be better, but I dont think this is +EV [/ QUOTE ] LOL really? Ax has better equity than 28 when called? NO F-ING WAY!!!! And yes, I think you pass up a ton of value if you don't sometimes utilize spots like these. Without a read on BTN I'm not sure I could do it with 28, suited connectors or broadways might make it a little easier it's tough to shove 28o with absolutely no read. Still tho, if you have aboslutely no history with BTN and he's a complete random, I don't think a shove is BAD. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tilt 32k: Squeeze all in with rags?
man u suck, all i was saying is that a hand that is often dominated when called like Ax would be a much better choice because it does better vs 88,99,TT especially no need to be a dick about it
|
|
|