#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
I have seen that someone have mentioned barry greenstein.
I am sorry if i did not mention it earlier but i meant online. Does Barry even play online? Please state your reasons as well. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
[ QUOTE ]
cts ansky aejones if someone lists tourny donks you shouldbe shot [/ QUOTE ] 1. you did list a tourney donk so I dont really need to ask 2 but 2. AEjones? Are you retarded? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
[ QUOTE ]
cts ansky aejones if someone lists tourny donks you shouldbe shot [/ QUOTE ] btch im cuter |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
[ QUOTE ]
cts ansky aejones if someone lists tourny donks you shouldbe shot [/ QUOTE ] Your right because mowing through hundreds of skilled people for 1 top prize is soooooooo much easier then working to get money from 1-3 people at 1 table. Cash game players have a harder time transitioning to MTT but there are high volume MTT players that are very good NLHE players. It takes a certain mental ability to play 12 hours/day for 2-7 days. Obv you can make more in 1 pot then a lot of MTT but the skill in MTT is much more vast and requires so much mental alertness. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
[ QUOTE ]
2. AEjones? Are you retarded? [/ QUOTE ] honestly, that's just mean |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2. AEjones? Are you retarded? [/ QUOTE ] honestly, that's just mean [/ QUOTE ] haha [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
ae look, now they are debating what takes more skill, cash or tournies. Id like to see this retard battle progress (yet if I ever got bored and watched a special ed class through a window ppl would get mad at me, interesting)
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
jman28 gets no love
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
[ QUOTE ]
jman28 gets no love [/ QUOTE ] neither does Thayer or Bond18 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 3 players on 2+2.
A lot of names but no ones is mentioning why these people should be considered to be the best.
|
|
|