Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:12 AM
iponnet iponnet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

hero smooth calls turn raise, c/c river

you are playing kind of deep, even donks catch hands
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:52 AM
mattaasen mattaasen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 98
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

yeah its a bad card but i dont think im folding.................if he filled up oh well shove get the money in and hope he pays off folding here is bad and i doubt he bluffs if u check with a busted draw so just shove it in his face hope he has kq

as for smooth calling or whatever the donk said before me? i want what he is smoking.....cause thats horrible!!!!.....just calling his min raise this deep with two flush draws on such a coordinated board against a donk who seems like a station out of position is f'n AWFUL

i think id probably check raise turn , but your lead is not bad at all either

im raising turn 100 percent of time here..... u played it fine and id pay him off if he beat u just too much in the pot
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:07 AM
john voight john voight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SALAZARRRRRRRR
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

lol i play NL30 and I think the guy who said smooth turn and then c/c river is mildy retarded.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:09 AM
Bluegrassplayer Bluegrassplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 350
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

Well I think he's right about c/c the river, I like your bet on the turn though. I don't think I can get away from this one. I think it's possible that he overplays a/k or k/q here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:19 AM
DjSkyy DjSkyy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SF CA USA
Posts: 110
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

I think you played it fine, and should shove the river.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:23 AM
iponnet iponnet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

we cant c/c river if we raise his turn raise, because we will be c/c the rest of our stack. if villan is a moron he may verywell be slowplaying something like AJ/88.

and there is a reason why you play NL30 you dumbnooob
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:50 AM
AllTheCheese AllTheCheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

Why would we not want to pump the turn? We have the nuts drawing to the nuts, effectively. He doesn't have AJ. There's really no reason why he would small-bet the flop with AJ when he could

a) Take a free card (IMO far and away the most likely thing an unknown would do if he had AJ)
b) Make a bigger bluff because he only has Ace high

The only reason to call turn is if you think we can maximize value this way. IMO this is not the case if we put Villain on sets and two pair.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:29 AM
iponnet iponnet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

[ QUOTE ]
Why would we not want to pump the turn? We have the nuts drawing to the nuts, effectively. He doesn't have AJ. There's really no reason why he would small-bet the flop with AJ when he could

a) Take a free card (IMO far and away the most likely thing an unknown would do if he had AJ)
b) Make a bigger bluff because he only has Ace high

The only reason to call turn is if you think we can maximize value this way. IMO this is not the case if we put Villain on sets and two pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

you are right but I would make an exception since we are playing deep, if we had 100bb your play above is standard.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:15 PM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 400 NL: Deep stack committed? Seems ridiculous but should I c/f ri

[ QUOTE ]
hero smooth calls turn raise, c/c river

[/ QUOTE ]
Wait, what?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.