Official ACC-BIG TEN challenge 2007

[capone0]

Luck box that Lawson isn't playing. Frasor and QT aren't bad off the bench but they aren't good enough to start. Frasor can't shoot for anything.

[johnnybeef]

Wait a sec, Mayo wasn't Mr. Ohio last year?????

[jalapenoguy]

[ QUOTE ]
Wait a sec, Mayo wasn't Mr. Ohio last year?????

[/ QUOTE ]

he won it in 06 but played in west virginia last year.

[capone0]

Wow can more of our guys get hurt.

[ADLinden]

if osu could shoot they might of had a chance in this game

[Troll_Inc]

Let's not get carried away here.

If you go back and look at the Final Four to 1997, both the ACC and Big Ten each have had 10 teams.

Nat'l champions is a little too narrow, and just making the tournament a bit too broad.

I suppose you could also look at Sweet Sixteen appearances over that time to determine the number of quality teams between the two conferences.

[kyro]

WE ARE!

[dlk9s]

[ QUOTE ]


If you go back and look at the Final Four to 1997, both the ACC and Big Ten each have had 10 teams.


[/ QUOTE ]

Minnesota's appearance does not officially count.

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
Let's not get carried away here.

If you go back and look at the Final Four to 1997, both the ACC and Big Ten each have had 10 teams.

Nat'l champions is a little too narrow, and just making the tournament a bit too broad.

I suppose you could also look at Sweet Sixteen appearances over that time to determine the number of quality teams between the two conferences.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, NC is too broad and making the field is too narrow because they dont show what you want them to show. Odds are the Big10 would be better in SOME category that you could arbitrarily define.