#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] c/c [/ QUOTE ] I think theres definitely value in a bet here. some worse queens will tag along given the nature of the board, as will most Jx's since they all have gutshots to go with them. [/ QUOTE ] Having a gs on the river really won't help him much, will it? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
i think it's a merge against some villains for sure, but perhaps not against the villain in the actual hand [/ QUOTE ] I'd think it was really more a 'merge' depending on image right? If OP was a 9/7 - I'd argue this was a definite merge and their ranges are permapolarized. For a 50/30, not so much. Merging ranges is fully dependent on having rigidly defined ranges whether they arise from players style or how a certain situation played out. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] c/c [/ QUOTE ] I think theres definitely value in a bet here. some worse queens will tag along given the nature of the board, as will most Jx's since they all have gutshots to go with them. [/ QUOTE ] Having a gs on the river really won't help him much, will it? [/ QUOTE ] no [censored] [censored]. wtf kind of reply is that was implying that he's more likely to get to the river with a jack given the board. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] c/c [/ QUOTE ] I think theres definitely value in a bet here. some worse queens will tag along given the nature of the board, as will most Jx's since they all have gutshots to go with them. [/ QUOTE ] Having a gs on the river really won't help him much, will it? [/ QUOTE ] no [censored] [censored]. wtf kind of reply is that was implying that he's more likely to get to the river with a jack given the board. [/ QUOTE ] but hes not willing to call with it tough guy |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I check call because every draw missed and the only hand he might pay off here is QT, all others beat you and I doubt he will fold a better hand. c/c is the line here. [/ QUOTE ] Seconded [/ QUOTE ] 4th [/ QUOTE ] +1 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] c/c [/ QUOTE ] I think theres definitely value in a bet here. some worse queens will tag along given the nature of the board, as will most Jx's since they all have gutshots to go with them. [/ QUOTE ] Having a gs on the river really won't help him much, will it? [/ QUOTE ] no [censored] [censored]. wtf kind of reply is that was implying that he's more likely to get to the river with a jack given the board. [/ QUOTE ] I thought someone had to state the obv flaw in your post. You're saying there's value in a river bet because he's calling the turn with JT. He's not calling your river bet with 2nd pair mid kicker. This is certainly a c/c and the post I qouted sums up why in a great way. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MERGE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] c/c [/ QUOTE ] I think theres definitely value in a bet here. some worse queens will tag along given the nature of the board, as will most Jx's since they all have gutshots to go with them. [/ QUOTE ] Having a gs on the river really won't help him much, will it? [/ QUOTE ] no [censored] [censored]. wtf kind of reply is that was implying that he's more likely to get to the river with a jack given the board. [/ QUOTE ] I thought someone had to state the obv flaw in your post. You're saying there's value in a river bet because he's calling the turn with JT. He's not calling your river bet with 2nd pair mid kicker. This is certainly a c/c and the post I qouted sums up why in a great way. [/ QUOTE ] yea, sorry I got short with you... your other post came off as kinda arrogant/dickish. |
|
|