|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT - rivers top set on 3 to flush board against 16/9/oo
[ QUOTE ]
He has an infinite aggression factor. Why has no one mentioned checking to him so he can bluff his missed flush draw? With these stats I have a feeling he is raising some time earlier with a flush or a set. If he had a draw he will fold to almost any bet. He is sickeningly aggressive too. I would check let him bluff and if he happens to have the flush he gets paid off, good for him. [/ QUOTE ] true, true, there's a chance then that he will fire and you'll be able to get more value out of it. if he has a flush, it's a cooler. but checking to him seems to be better indeed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT - rivers top set on 3 to flush board against 16/9/oo
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He has an infinite aggression factor. Why has no one mentioned checking to him so he can bluff his missed flush draw? With these stats I have a feeling he is raising some time earlier with a flush or a set. If he had a draw he will fold to almost any bet. He is sickeningly aggressive too. I would check let him bluff and if he happens to have the flush he gets paid off, good for him. [/ QUOTE ] true, true, there's a chance then that he will fire and you'll be able to get more value out of it. if he has a flush, it's a cooler. but checking to him seems to be better indeed. [/ QUOTE ] I think it looks pretty obvious if we bet two streets then check on a blank river. Almost like we want him to bluff....I think betting this river to get JJ+ to call is much better. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT - rivers top set on 3 to flush board against 16/9/oo
What about weak-leading (~$11) with intentions of calling any shove? We still get value from his AA type hands as well as giving him a chance to hang himself on this river. Only problem I see with it is that he'll be hard pressed to bluff you leaving you with such huge odds to call.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT - rivers top set on 3 to flush board against 16/9/oo
With such a high AF, is it possible that he also bets any overpair? I dont have the time to work out the math right now, but my gut feeling is that he would have to bet the river a large % of the time to outway the risk of having him check behind. Unless he's been bluffing a lot lately, im still leaning towards betting the river.
|
|
|