set+oesd turnplay? riverplay?

[sondring]

I'd say turn is questionable, though probably closer to a bet against passive calling stations. The only reason to check is because getting CR would suck a lot.

As played river VB is perfect.

[CrushinFelt]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd say turn is questionable, though probably closer to a bet against passive calling stations. The only reason to check is because getting CR would suck a lot.

As played river VB is perfect.

[/ QUOTE ]

To get value from what? I don't see anything calling other than 24.

[sondring]

[ QUOTE ]
To get value from what? I don't see anything calling other than 24.

[/ QUOTE ]

shrug. people are stupid. I got called by a naked QQ on a K5T3K board yesterday after betting the flop and checking the turn. I had K5xx.

[Rob121]

i dont see why you are raising the flop here.

[wazz]

I don't know why anyone wouldn't raise this flop. Bet the turn as well, give him a chance to fold 24.

[sondring]

If he called the flop raise I don't think he ever plans on folding 24 on that turn.

[wire]

I don't like turn check. Villain could have 24 and be scared that you have 47. Why reraise the flop if you're going to check the turn? Nothing changed. You still have a huge draw and villain has the azz end of a straight (or middle, bottom set).

Checking screws up your line. Bet the turn.

[Kala1928]

[ QUOTE ]
If he called the flop raise I don't think he ever plans on folding 24 on that turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yet people sometimes do. Even if he didnt he might fold on the river!

[Rob121]

oh didnt see the redraws to nut sraight yeah raising is fine. get it all in on flop if possible

[grizy]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know why anyone wouldn't raise this flop. Bet the turn as well, give him a chance to fold 24.

[/ QUOTE ]

Correct line here. You aren't getting value out of many hands and once you checked the turn you basically gave up realistic chances of folding out 24.