|
|
|
|
#2
11-27-2007, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
I fold now, rest looks purrty standard what am I talking about bet the turn [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#4
11-27-2007, 02:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
never played with tsarrat but doesn't your line look pretty bluffy? [/ QUOTE ] i don't think so unless tsarrast thinks OP will bet out into two players with air a lot on this board.
|
|
#5
11-28-2007, 01:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
never played with tsarrat but doesn't your line look pretty bluffy? [/ QUOTE ] This is why you should fold [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
|
|
#7
11-28-2007, 01:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
It is a spot where hero's range is completely undefined, and tsarrast is going to usually have showdown value hands here that either beat a bluff or do not beat a bluff. When he raises in a spot where DJ either has a flush, fh or is bluffing (given this action and this board), a raise signifies a lot of strength.
Therefore I agree with fsu that this should be a fold, though im not nearly good enough to snap fold [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. It is important to note that we do beat 2 very reasonable combinations of flushes (7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] and 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]) which would likely play this way. However higher flushes and 88 should also be given a fair amount of weight.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
