Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:17 PM
AE6 AE6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: cuz [censored] him, that\'s why
Posts: 3,120
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Value bet. He may think you're repping a narrow range by firing this river, and will call down light.

[/ QUOTE ]

if he thinks i have a narrow range here then why would he call down light?

[/ QUOTE ]
he thinks the legit part of your range is small, not your overall range (VBs + bluffs)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:25 PM
spivey spivey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,645
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

Yes, AE6 has it right. BTW, I think:

b/f > c/f >> c/c >> b/c against this opponent

I would never c/c or b/c against a player like this who probably isn't going to turn a made hand into a bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:28 PM
the machine the machine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: leveling myself
Posts: 4,975
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, AE6 has it right. BTW, I think:

b/f > c/f >> c/c >> b/c against this opponent

I would never c/c or b/c against a player like this who probably isn't going to turn a made hand into a bluff.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok thats exactly what i thought, but gratned that that card changed the dynamic of the board a lot i opted to check because i just couldnt figure him for a hand that would pay off if i led. maybe he thinks my bluff range now is wider and might but i dont see why hed call a bet here with QJ/KJ

i checked he bet 62 i folded.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2007, 12:43 AM
Golfdish Golfdish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

Tbh id rather c/r AI than c/c here, simply because he is never betting with a worse hand. So he has either AJ a flush or FH, at least by c/r AI you can occasionally win the pot.

I still like c/f because if you bet i dont think he looks you up with a random J or underpair here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:01 AM
the machine the machine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: leveling myself
Posts: 4,975
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

[ QUOTE ]
Tbh id rather c/r AI than c/c here, simply because he is never betting with a worse hand. So he has either AJ a flush or FH, at least by c/r AI you can occasionally win the pot.

I still like c/f because if you bet i dont think he looks you up with a random J or underpair here.

[/ QUOTE ]

if i check he bets he never folds to a c/r. stacks arent deep enough, and even if they were why would i be check raising a hand that beat AJ given the line id taken thus far. cr/ai is getting looked up by AJ+ 100% of the time imo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:03 AM
loosbastard loosbastard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: gettin\' no respect
Posts: 1,284
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

[ QUOTE ]
b/f > c/f >> c/c >> b/c against this opponent

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. You're getting owned hardcore if you c/c frequently in this spot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:08 AM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

b/f

dont expect to be called much
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:15 AM
Golfdish Golfdish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default Re: KK against thinking opponent

Why are we wanting to b/f? what hands that we beat will pay us off?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.