|
View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
Yes | 7 | 16.28% | |
No | 14 | 32.56% | |
No, but my significant other does | 0 | 0% | |
No, but I'd consider it | 4 | 9.30% | |
Tanning is gay, dude | 18 | 41.86% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Keep the antes. I think you should make all the SNGs 10 man, because it will increase the regulars' win rate, which will make them play more.
If you want to stop the stalling at the high stakes, just stop PokerinPb from using whatever program he is using and everything will be fine. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
FWIW most people are saying go back to Part structure because the SNGs were so much softer back then. The structure wasn't the reason they were so soft, it was more the players and possibly the fact that they were 10 handed. Another thing you could consider is increasing the starting chips to 1750 or 2000, which might work.
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
If you want to stop the stalling at the high stakes, just stop PokerinPb from using whatever program he is using and everything will be fine. [/ QUOTE ] There are quite a few people stalling lately who are not named poker_in_pb. I prefer not to name names but I will say that something really needs to be done about it. It is getting to the point where people anticipate 4 hands ahead of time how much they need to stall so the blind will go up when it's their button. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW most people are saying go back to Part structure because the SNGs were so much softer back then. The structure wasn't the reason they were so soft, it was more the players and possibly the fact that they were 10 handed. Another thing you could consider is increasing the starting chips to 1750 or 2000, which might work. [/ QUOTE ] The main reason I think people want the Party structure is because it effectively ends stalling. At least this is my reason. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
- Keep The Ante
- More Sng turbo 6 players |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
lower the rake for sng regs' sake plz. the 32+3 turbo is a joke. I would like to see a good lvl between 25+2 and 55+5 turbo. and change 25+2 to 28+2, 55+5 to 56+4 or stuff like that. The rake has been too high for us to beat the game. lower the rake and find a good lvl between those 2 would be a good idea.
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
I would prefer 100/200/25 be changed to 150/300/25 and keep the antes. [/ QUOTE ] |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
faster turbos ,lower rake.
or /hands not time. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Please keep the ante's, if you make a change replacing the 100/200 25 ante level with a 150/300 25 ante would be the change to make.
The rake on the 32+3 is too high, it would be nice to have a level to play between $27s and the $60s without such a high rake. There's not a serious multi-tabler that wants to play that level because of the rake. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
BTW one more thing about rake if you were to make these threads in SSNL/MSNL/HSNL/MTT they would not ask to lower rake, they would ask for structure changes, stuff like synchronizing breaks in MTTs, adding more high stakes 6max games, etc. The fact STTF is asking for lower rake means that it is a serious problem effecting the long term profitability of a games and not just an easy way to save $1 a sng.
|
|
|