|
|
|
|
#1
11-26-2007, 02:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] of course he should lay down KK to sammy. there's no way on earth right that sammy would have bet 100k into that pot with anything other than AA[sarcasm]. [/ QUOTE ] Umm, if you would've been paying any attention preflop, you would realize that this is the best observation you've ever made on 2 + 2 minus the sarcasm part. If that wasn't the other two kings, it the other two aces 100% of the time. What do we not grasp about this concept? [/ QUOTE ] and if you've never played kings where you were sure that you were against aces and called anyway then you sir are a very inexperienced player. 
|
|
#2
11-26-2007, 07:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] of course he should lay down KK to sammy. there's no way on earth right that sammy would have bet 100k into that pot with anything other than AA[sarcasm]. [/ QUOTE ] Umm, if you would've been paying any attention preflop, you would realize that this is the best observation you've ever made on 2 + 2 minus the sarcasm part. If that wasn't the other two kings, it the other two aces 100% of the time. What do we not grasp about this concept? [/ QUOTE ] and if you've never played kings where you were sure that you were against aces and called anyway then you sir are a very inexperienced player. [/ QUOTE ] I haven't had this happen since like....yesterday.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
