#341
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm not saying it wasn't a TD but its [censored] that wasn't reviewed. [/ QUOTE ] I may be wrong, but I bet the play WAS reviewed. It's just that the booth saw conclusive evidence before the PAT, so there was no need to stop play. Josh W [/ QUOTE ] that's what I figured as well, but it's way too obvious an answer. Clearly something wicked is going on here. [/ QUOTE ] Estimated time from TD to PAT? Thats pretty quick, but it is certainly possible. Wouldnt want to take a minute to be sure? [/ QUOTE ] About 30 seconds ? |
#342
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
Reid can't challenge within 2 minutes of the half. Has to be a booth review. Obviously he was in, but that is exactly the kind of play they need to be reviewing. [/ QUOTE ] I really can't understand why everyone thinks it wasn't reviewed. You think the booth guys just went to lunch 30 seconds early? You don't think they looked at the replay a hundred times before the refs even gave an explanation of the flag? |
#343
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
is it heresy that i, a die hard giants fan, am cheering for the eagles in this game? probably [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, pretty much all the Cowboys and Giants fans have admitted to rooting for the Eagles tonight. Strange times. |
#344
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Who would have thought it would be fun to cheer for the Eagles. [/ QUOTE ] Haha so true. I dont really care who wins but it would be fun to see the Pats nervous and challenged and pressured a little bit. The Colts game was fun as hell to watch. [/ QUOTE ] It pains me to say it, but I like Brady. That said, IMO, he's been a whiney little bitch this year. I think he needs a little reality check. I'd like to see them lose their perfect season at home to a team that they should murder. [/ QUOTE ] what has he whined about? why does he need a reality check? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not going to get into an argument about it because it's my opinion from what I've seen of him this year. I have seen several times where he's gone apeshit yelling at people... a side of Brady I've never seen until this year. I think the great success so far this year is fueling his ego, something that wasn't there before. A reailty check in a loss would curb that aspect of him, which doesn't suit him at all. [/ QUOTE ] he was yelling at people the last 2 seasons.... during these past few seasons, several people have talked about "seeing a side of brady they've never seen before, yelling at people, etc" explain why or you are full of it. [/ QUOTE ] I don't remember what game it was, but I have burnt in my head a game where they were up big in the 4th quarter and a WR appeared to run the wrong route causing an incomplete pass. Brady ran to him yelling at him all the way back to the huddle. Another time, he went apeshit on an o-lineman on a false start up big late in a game. You just don't bigtime your teammates like that, no matter who you are. He has never done that before. |
#345
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm not saying it wasn't a TD but its [censored] that wasn't reviewed. [/ QUOTE ] I may be wrong, but I bet the play WAS reviewed. It's just that the booth saw conclusive evidence before the PAT, so there was no need to stop play. Josh W [/ QUOTE ] that's what I figured as well, but it's way too obvious an answer. Clearly something wicked is going on here. [/ QUOTE ] Estimated time from TD to PAT? Thats pretty quick, but it is certainly possible. Wouldnt want to take a minute to be sure? [/ QUOTE ] About 30 seconds ? [/ QUOTE ] There was a flag on the play. Whatever fuels your fire, though. |
#346
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reid can't challenge within 2 minutes of the half. Has to be a booth review. Obviously he was in, but that is exactly the kind of play they need to be reviewing. [/ QUOTE ] I really can't understand why everyone thinks it wasn't reviewed. You think the booth guys just went to lunch 30 seconds early? You don't think they looked at the replay a hundred times before the refs even gave an explanation of the flag? [/ QUOTE ] lol not even a minute elapsed. It usually takes 2 minutes for a review, because they let the guy see a few angles. ALSO they say "the play will be reviewed" on the mic. Nobody said that here. |
#347
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reid can't challenge within 2 minutes of the half. Has to be a booth review. Obviously he was in, but that is exactly the kind of play they need to be reviewing. [/ QUOTE ] I really can't understand why everyone thinks it wasn't reviewed. You think the booth guys just went to lunch 30 seconds early? You don't think they looked at the replay a hundred times before the refs even gave an explanation of the flag? [/ QUOTE ] Meh, it's possible. I'm not really that outraged about it either way. |
#348
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm not saying it wasn't a TD but its [censored] that wasn't reviewed. [/ QUOTE ] I may be wrong, but I bet the play WAS reviewed. It's just that the booth saw conclusive evidence before the PAT, so there was no need to stop play. Josh W [/ QUOTE ] that's what I figured as well, but it's way too obvious an answer. Clearly something wicked is going on here. [/ QUOTE ] I thought that as well, but the pats got on the field in like 15 seconds so they only had about 2 looks at it. |
#349
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
I mean a TD is a TD. But it was close enough to not being one to warrant a look. It's not like the Pats need any more favors. That's all.
|
#350
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official SNF PHI/NE thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reid can't challenge within 2 minutes of the half. Has to be a booth review. Obviously he was in, but that is exactly the kind of play they need to be reviewing. [/ QUOTE ] I really can't understand why everyone thinks it wasn't reviewed. You think the booth guys just went to lunch 30 seconds early? You don't think they looked at the replay a hundred times before the refs even gave an explanation of the flag? [/ QUOTE ] A hundred times? It was certainly less than a minute from the actual catch until the PAT. |
|
|