|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
[ QUOTE ]
call and c/r most turns (especially [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]'s) [/ QUOTE ] Hmm, I had the [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] turns on my list of non-safe cards. If he's not raising this flop with a made hand but with something I currently beat, then I'd expect flush draws to be a decent part of his range. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
he could have a set here and act like he s drawing i would call and bet the turn if u get raised i think ur beat
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
call, don't shove. see what the turn brings and how he acts
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
I'm confused. If we call then whats our "plan" on the turn. We don't just call without a plan. Do we ch/rai safe cards, lead again, what?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
If I called, I'd lead safe turns.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
[ QUOTE ]
If I called, I'd lead safe turns. [/ QUOTE ] Isn't calling a raise and then lead a donkish line? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - QQ versus decent TAG on drawy flop
Surely by simply calling we aim to check raise all in on the turn?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|