#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
There's no ICM in heads up situations. Every single chip has the exact same value.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
FWIW, "Mathematics of Poker" by Chen and Ankenman has the exact solution in an easy to use table. Basically, for each starting hand, it says the maximum stack size to shove for each hand and the maximum stack size to call a shove for each hand. For example, with 63o, you should shove from the SB with a stack of 1.7 big blinds or less, and you should call a shove from the BB with a stack of 3.0 big blinds or less. It also gives all of the weird broken cases. Like it is correct to shove 63s from the SB with 2.3 big blinds or less, but it is also correct to do it as a semibluff with between 5.1 and 7.1 big blinds (but you have to fold between 2.3 and 5.1).
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
With 6-3 off-suit , you can shove profitably if your stack is 2.591343 small blinds after the blinds have been taken or 1.2956715 big blinds . (2.591343/2 = 1.2956715)
http://www2.decf.berkeley.edu/~chubukov/rankings.html |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
So you guys like the tables in MOP best? I don't think it would be all that hard to know cutoff hands. Should be faster than computing the power index in my head.
|
|
|