#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request: Stars Shortcuts
[ QUOTE ]
I would pay for a Stars version of FTP Shortcuts. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure thousands of people would be prepared to pay $50 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request: Stars Shortcuts
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would pay for a Stars version of FTP Shortcuts. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure thousands of people would be prepared to pay $25 [/ QUOTE ] It would have to have a lot of new things to make me spend $50. I spent $25 for FTSC, basically to have a GUI for my BetPot/Reload scripts, Table Highliter, etc. Most of what FTSC does can be accomplished with Scripts. There is no way I would of paid $50 for FTSC for what I needed it for. $20-$30 was perfectly reasonable, but $50* for an application, I expect A LOT more. *Take my statement with a grain of salt, as I play uNL currently. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request: Stars Shortcuts
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I would pay for a Stars version of FTP Shortcuts. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure thousands of people would be prepared to pay $25 [/ QUOTE ] It would have to have a lot of new things to make me spend $50. I spent $25 for FTSC, basically to have a GUI for my BetPot/Reload scripts, Table Highliter, etc. Most of what FTSC does can be accomplished with Scripts. There is no way I would of paid $50 for FTSC for what I needed it for. $20-$30 was perfectly reasonable, but $50* for an application, I expect A LOT more. *Take my statement with a grain of salt, as I play uNL currently. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Thousands would definitely pay $50 but maybe several tens of thousands would pay $25 haha, this is a problem for the publisher [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request: Stars Shortcuts
I'd pay much more than $50 for this.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request: Stars Shortcuts
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I would pay for a Stars version of FTP Shortcuts. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure thousands of people would be prepared to pay $25 [/ QUOTE ] It would have to have a lot of new things to make me spend $50. I spent $25 for FTSC, basically to have a GUI for my BetPot/Reload scripts, Table Highliter, etc. Most of what FTSC does can be accomplished with Scripts. There is no way I would of paid $50 for FTSC for what I needed it for. $20-$30 was perfectly reasonable, but $50* for an application, I expect A LOT more. *Take my statement with a grain of salt, as I play uNL currently. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Thousands would definitely pay $50 but maybe several tens of thousands would pay $25 haha, this is a problem for the publisher [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Can we Pokerstove this??? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Request: Stars Shortcuts
Well,
When I do this, it will not be carrying any price tag [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I'd like to stick with my current model - free for anyone, those who wish to donate may do so at their choice. At the most I include details how to do so with the scripts. Obviously with this model I do not receive as much $$$ as if I forced payments (1000 * $50 is a lot of money, and I'd estimate there are many more BetPot users than that) - but then we are not here to make money from each other imo [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] With any luck the next version of BetPot will have a nice GUI - I think that is the most important one, yes? Planner is already GUI, and the other two barely need one - if any settings need changed, it is pretty much a one off. Copy protection / activation is a hassle I'd rather do without, and kinda precludes having the script's source code in plain view - which IMO is a very important consideration for security of our accounts... AHK is not some inherently safe, underpowered programming environment ya know [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] dave. |
|
|