#1
|
|||
|
|||
1600x1200 Resolution ??
Looking to get a 20" or 22" widescreen to 4 table on Stars. Is 1600x1200 the minimun resolution I should get?
Thanks in advance. I checked the stickyand used search but was still confused as the minimun requirments. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
yes.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
Lets say I get a 24" with 1600x1200, can I 6 table easy?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
If you're getting a widescreen, you probably want 1920x1200, since 1600x1200 is not really widescreen proportions.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
Understand that the size of the monitor in inches doesn't matter much for multi-tabling. 1600x1200 is perfect for 4 tabling without overlapping, adding another table per row you'll either need to overlap or shrink them a bit. The tables will be bigger because the monitor is bigger but they won't be all that much easier to read because the pixels will be bigger too.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
Stars does have resizble tables. I play 3 or 4 on at 1280x1024 without overlap. If you want to run the tables at full size, you need 1600x1200.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
I'm looking at picking up a monitor, and the 1600x1200 204b is still around $300, whereas I could pickup a 1280x1024 model for around $150.
How many sites these days don't actually have resizable tables? It seems like most do. I play on FTP right now, but might consider playing some on Absolute or others. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1600x1200 Resolution ??
The bigger resolution is worth the money.
|
|
|