![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
well both QBs had played very little, no? First start for both Sanchez/stanford-guy in that one? [/ QUOTE ] No, our starting QB was playing (albeit with a broken middle finger on his throwing hand at halftime for which he should have been taken out of the game). Our backup then won the next 2 games, barely lost to Oregon, and then healthy Booty came back, beat OSU, beat Cal. And coming from somebody who hates Booty, he played by far the best game of the year last game. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
decided to only bet the under and lay off betting ASU too
not sure how ASU will handle the USC pass rush USC/ASU u49.5 bet 2.2u to win 2u |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
well both QBs had played very little, no? First start for both Sanchez/stanford-guy in that one? [/ QUOTE ] Even tho this is false, you're saying that Stanford's D >>> USC's Def. At USC. Right. Yeah, I don't see any way SC could lose either... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Under 50.5 -105 2 Units
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Under looks like a good bet right about now.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
USC +.5 2nd Half 2 Units
Under 27.5 2nd Half 2 Units |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oOO(they just never get anything right...)
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
USC +.5 2nd Half 2 Units Under 27.5 2nd Half 2 Units [/ QUOTE ] What are the lines? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Usc +1/2 -120 on bookmaker
Usc pk -120 VIP (2 units USC +1/2 -120 for me) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] USC +.5 2nd Half 2 Units Under 27.5 2nd Half 2 Units [/ QUOTE ] What are the lines? [/ QUOTE ] I got -110 on both at SIA WSEX has +.5 -120 and Under 27 +105 |
![]() |
|
|