#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
Villain is 21/5/1,3 (19)
Party Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter BB: $105.71 UTG: $105.98 Hero (CO): $98.50 BTN: $67.66 SB: $56.60 Pre-Flop: XX dealt to Hero (CO) UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $4</font>, 2 folds, BB calls $3 Flop: ($8.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $6</font>, BB calls $6 Turn: ($20.50) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks What do you bet with here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
A flush or a bluff. Two pair, set etc i would check and hope to improve or make a valuebet on river.
If he is very loose and calls A LOT, then I might bet with 2 pair or set on turn, but generally IŽd check it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
gah, just tell us what you have and we'll give you some good advice.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
Hmmm, I'm going to bet my bluff, 1 pair, straight, and flush hands on the turn. I check my medium strength hands like two pair and sets in order to improve when behind and induce bluff when ahead. I think by betting your very strong and very weak hands on the turn you successful mask your range enough to make it generally less exploitable.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
Holecards: QQ
Thank you, Up-grey-de and LooseAggressive for your answers! I appreciate that you answer even I havent told the holecards [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
[ QUOTE ]
Holecards: QQ Thank you, Up-grey-de and LooseAggressive for your answers! I appreciate that you answer even I havent told the holecards [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] With or without a spade? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
I only bet with a flush or all out bluff in these situations, if you have any other hands check behind for pot control then evalute river.
Edit: nm bluff ok me thinks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
cbboy: no spade
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Second barrel situation IP - no scarecard but wet board
Betting as a bluff here with QQ is stupid, he shouldnt be folding Kx unless he's weak tight. If you double barrel its for value which is fine against some opponents.
|
|
|