|
|
|
|
#1
11-22-2007, 02:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Quick quiz
i would think that A9 should be significantly lower than AA with a range that beyond monsters includes med-high suited hands, connectors, and single pairs. even though we were drawing slim against monsters w/ AA, we're much worse off w/ A9(from ~9% to 1%). also, w/A9 we lose equity to the overpairs that we had ~90% against w/AA. against high/broadway unpaired flush and straight draws AA is again better off b/c of overcards to our pair when holding A9.
edit: maybe not significantly lower but i don't think they are that close; no stove on this computer though. 
|
|
#2
11-22-2007, 02:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Quick quiz
[ QUOTE ]
i would think that A9 should be significantly lower than AA with a range that beyond monsters includes med-high suited hands, connectors, and single pairs. [/ QUOTE ] A9 and AA have very different equities if you include overpairs. If you remove them, then I think it gets pretty close.
|
|
#3
11-22-2007, 03:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Quick quiz
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i would think that A9 should be significantly lower than AA with a range that beyond monsters includes med-high suited hands, connectors, and single pairs. [/ QUOTE ] A9 and AA have very different equities if you include overpairs. If you remove them, then I think it gets pretty close. [/ QUOTE ] i agree. it makes sense to discount the overpairs. i hadn't really done any hard calcs; was just comparing the estimated equity against each group w/n the range (AA v A9) and i had all combos of TT-QQ in there which gives 18 combos that AA dominate but that A9 is dominated by. like you said that's gives AA a serious boost here. how about all TT combos and one combo of JJ? obv it fits the pf play better. edit: maybe even just a couple combos of TT,
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
