![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i actually don't just calling this turn. not like it commits us, if we call, eff stacks are $85 going into the river.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If people don't want to continue when the 3 falls on the turn, then I think we have to fold on the flop, unless we assume that the Villain is tricky enough to bet a dry flop which likely missed us which I wouldn't put against most Villains. So I guess if you assume he'll check-raise the flop as a bluff and shut down after that, then calling is ok...but I think u can usually fold the flop if ur going to fold the turn when a 3 comes.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If people don't want to continue when the 3 falls on the turn, then I think we have to fold on the flop, unless we assume that the Villain is tricky enough to bet a dry flop which likely missed us which I wouldn't put against most Villains. So I guess if you assume he'll check-raise the flop as a bluff and shut down after that, then calling is ok...but I think u can usually fold the flop if ur going to fold the turn when a 3 comes. [/ QUOTE ] So true...If only I could think so clearly in the heat of the moment. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nits like that always have the goods here. If you don't fold the flop (which would make an insane read) at least fold the turn.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its easy just to say hes a nit fold, but correct me if im wrong but wouldnt nits have a lower agr factor then 3.5 and hes calling 15 percent of his hands wich is a range of: 77+,A7s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KTo+,QJo so does that change anything???
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hes not calling with 15% of his hands. hes calling with pocket pairs and big suited broadways, mostly AXs
|
![]() |
|
|