|
|
#11
11-21-2007, 08:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bluff vs thinking reg 1000 NL.
looks good
|
|
#12
11-21-2007, 09:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bluff vs thinking reg 1000 NL.
I think this is pretty decent because even when you are called you've almost always got 15 outs. With that said, I'm curious as to whether you would be willing to raise in this spot w/ AA or KK, as opposed to a full house or a 9. If that's not the case, and most players will exercise pot control wth these types of hands, the raise probably seems a bit fishy to the donkbettor. Still, i think he folds a mid PP enough to make this a pretty strong play.
|
|
#14
11-21-2007, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bluff vs thinking reg 1000 NL.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I like it. He is weak here a lot. [/ QUOTE ] jinx if he bets river do you shove, and if he checks how much do you bet (assuming brick city) [/ QUOTE ] no, like 3/4 pot.
|
|
#15
11-21-2007, 10:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bluff vs thinking reg 1000 NL.
I see this as a great opportunity for him to bet here with a 9, with intent of pushing on any form of raise. I dont know if this is the best spot for you to bluff. He has a 9 here great bet on his part. Id prolly just fold.
|
|
#16
11-21-2007, 10:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bluff vs thinking reg 1000 NL.
[ QUOTE ]
I see this as a great opportunity for him to bet here with a 9, with intent of pushing on any form of raise. I dont know if this is the best spot for you to bluff. He has a 9 here great bet on his part. Id prolly just fold. [/ QUOTE ] given location, no doubt
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
