#1
|
|||
|
|||
50 NL | 55 -> good move?
PokerStars Game #13377992760: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2007/11/21 - 12:32:35 (ET)
Table 'Stebbins' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: delgados ($61.10 in chips) Seat 2: Günther1986 ($29.85 in chips) Seat 3: nick lesson ($61.55 in chips) Seat 4: SKIBI_T1 ($17.50 in chips) Seat 5: hyoyang ($66.10 in chips) Seat 6: ILetUMuck ($47 in chips) Seat 7: Sharif24 ($17 in chips) SKIBI_T1: posts small blind $0.25 hyoyang: posts big blind $0.50 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to ILetUMuck [5d 5s] ILetUMuck: calls $0.50 Sharif24: folds delgados: folds Günther1986: calls $0.50 nick lesson: raises $1.50 to $2 SKIBI_T1: folds hyoyang: folds ILetUMuck: calls $1.50 Günther1986: calls $1.50 *** FLOP *** [Jd 7h 3h] ILetUMuck: checks Günther1986: bets $3 nick lesson: folds ILetUMuck: calls $3 *** TURN *** [Jd 7h 3h] [As] ILetUMuck: checks Günther1986: bets $4 ILetUMuck: raises $10 to $14 villian is 47 4 19 over 90 hands |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50 NL | 55 -> good move?
I feel you get reraised or called too much to make this reasonable, although villains stats are pretty wacky. I'd look at whether his high aggression factor is a result of betting almost everything and never folding, or checking/folding/betting all the time, and I'd be more inclined to bluff the folding station. In general, though, I'd fold the flop.
The guy is donk-betting into 2 people on the flop after calling in the big blind, and follows up on the turn again. Ill-time fancy plays like these seem to cost more money than they're worth. I'd prefer it if you had a semi-bluffing hand like 2 hearts or OESD. You might as well have 24o or 62o at this point in the hand. |
|
|