#1
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Forum Split Proposal. Need member input.
Proposal in AtF.
Last paragrah: [ QUOTE ] I will let others chime in as to why a split would be good. [/ QUOTE ] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSA: Forum Split Proposal. Need member input.
go for it. changes can always be made at a later date if need be. "it is better to try and fail than to never try at all..." yada yada... just do something and quit yapping about it.
EN |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSA: Forum Split Proposal. Need member input.
[ QUOTE ]
go for it. changes can always be made at a later date if need be. "it is better to try and fail than to never try at all..." yada yada... just do something and quit yapping about it. EN [/ QUOTE ] Would be great if you could post this in the AtF thread where it will be read by the powers who make these decisions. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSA: Forum Split Proposal. Need member input.
Really appreciate all the effot your putting forth Pboy, thanks for making sure the ball gets rolling once and for all.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSA: Forum Split Proposal. Need member input.
[ QUOTE ]
Really appreciate all the effot your putting forth Pboy, thanks for making sure the ball gets rolling once and for all. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks. Everybody be sure to drop a line in the AtF thread. It's getting overrun by trolls right now (like it always does), and more serious responses will help it from getting derailed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSA: Forum Split Proposal. Need member input.
I kno i dont post here much but i am making more of an effort to contribute lately. I added my 2c in ATF. Thanks for getting the ball rolling.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
*** Update ***
*** Update ***
From Mat Sklansky in the AtF thread: [ QUOTE ] While it's true that i hold the stamp of approval, I only use that stamp based on the opinions of those who use this site. I'm being pulled in many directions these days and the best way to get me to take action is through the mods. If moderators I trust tell me to make these moves, I will. [/ QUOTE ] So it's in the hands of the moderators at this point. I'm pretty sure that Nation and Diebitter support the change. Berge20 and CryMeARiver are probably a little concerned about making the change, but at least they know how we all feel about it and will hopefully keep that in mind as the decision is being made. Diebitter mention in 2 other threads that the big software update/change is taking place the first weekend of December, and a split could definitely not be done until after that happens. So maybe by Christmas we'll have 2 forums, better organized with less bickering. I hope the plan is 100+, as eventually we would like to see 3 forums: 2NL-50NL 100NL-200NL 400NL+ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** Update ***
2-5
100-400 600+ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** Update ***
[ QUOTE ]
2-5 100-400 600+ [/ QUOTE ] I don't think the 600+ forum would be very active; do you? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** Update ***
[ QUOTE ]
2NL-50NL 100NL-200NL 400NL+ [/ QUOTE ] A split along the lines of 100+/50- could even allow a good split of 4 forums ventually, if traffic permits and users want it: NL10 and below nl20-nl50 (I've seen sites with nl20) nl100-nl200 nl400+ |
|
|