#1
|
|||
|
|||
Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
Have villain at like 40/25, pretty aggro from what I've seen and my impression is that he doesn't like to give up pots, but it's by far from a concrete read. My image is aggro tag probably. Thoughts on this?
Party Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter BTN: $634.90 Hero (SB): $531 BB: $585.10 UTG: $466.44 MP: $394 CO: $519.60 Pre-Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) 4 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $16</font>, BB calls $12 Flop: ($32) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $26</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $77</font>, Hero calls $51 Turn: ($186) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BB bets $111</font>, Hero calls $111 River: ($408) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BB bets $381.10 and is All-In</font>, Hero calls $327 and is All-In Results: $1,062 Pot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
make a pair and pay off a fish.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
well...if u called the turn, I guess u'll need to call that river.
does he 3 bet alot? I find these 40/25 types don't 3 bet much. so AQ, QK, sometimes AK are all within his range. pluse TJ for sure. I donno, A4 A5 is possible, but that would be pretty sick. Does he raise flop with those hands? ( u never know with unknown fishes) however, I'd folding somewhere on the turn prob. u'r bluff catching a missed FD only, I don't know what other bluffable hand he could have. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
i am either taking this line or folding the flop/turn.
i probably can't fold the flop actually so i'd pitch the turn. people just don't bluff raise flops like that too often |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
i like this a lot
i'd kind of prefer a "bad" river since i think his bluff freq is higher but i'm calling basically any river as played |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
[ QUOTE ]
i like this a lot i'd kind of prefer a "bad" river since i think his bluff freq is higher but i'm calling basically any river as played [/ QUOTE ] like a spade? thats horrible |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
Ummm, I like folding the turn. What can you beat but a bluff?
KQ and JT seem particularly likely hands to me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
[ QUOTE ]
i like this a lot i'd kind of prefer a "bad" river since i think his bluff freq is higher but i'm calling basically any river as played [/ QUOTE ] You like this a lot because he gave a spew tard a chance to value-bet three streets? The fish doesn't have JT, KQ? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i like this a lot i'd kind of prefer a "bad" river since i think his bluff freq is higher but i'm calling basically any river as played [/ QUOTE ] like a spade? thats horrible [/ QUOTE ] terp is saying that a bad river card should narrow villain's value-shoving range (like he's probably not just shoving AT anymore), so if villain does shove a bad river he's bluffing at a higher frequency, which is true imo. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i like this a lot i'd kind of prefer a "bad" river since i think his bluff freq is higher but i'm calling basically any river as played [/ QUOTE ] like a spade? thats horrible [/ QUOTE ] terp is saying that a bad river card should narrow villain's value-shoving range (like he's probably not just shoving AT anymore), so if villain does shove a bad river he's bluffing at a higher frequency, which is true imo. [/ QUOTE ] I get the concept of a bad river gives V more chances to bluff. HOWEVER, the way this hand played out. All the hands that are considered bluffs b4 the river will have hit, and now will be v betting. and the hands that were ahead..well..its still vbetting or checking. this idea would make alot more sense if there was a straight draw on the table and the flush missed and the the straight draw complete. |
|
|