|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
I think a lot of people adhere to the peter principle in terms of adding tables; they add to the number at which they're inefficient.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
Very nice blogg! I've bookmarked it.
Comment on hand#2: I think your line is somewhat interesting because I agree with your thoughts. But I'd rather just lead the turn again or c/c because it looks so wierd. And when things don't make sense I often call down. Probably a leak but I think a lot of other players do too. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
vnice post. Had similar exprience. but haven't started the rethinking poker process
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
Nice post! I'm actually in the same spot and try to re-think about my game.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
Love the post, im in the rethinking mode atm. activily seeking a coach, playing less tables.. etc etc [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] hope i find the magic formula soon [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
that lefort is the bomb, son
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
c/c is def better on hand 2 unless you're bluffing (which would be bad).
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
Great post, what is your plan if he calls turn in hand 2?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealing with a downswing...
[ QUOTE ]
c/c is def better on hand 2 unless you're bluffing (which would be bad). [/ QUOTE ] Pretty sure he was trying to bluff him off a JT type hand, might be a bad assumption tho...? |
|
|