![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't think of why it is better to do it with 96o than ATo. Please elaborate.
ATo seems to have slightly better equity and since AT holds an ace, it is less likely that he does and more likely he will fold to your 3bet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
its obv better to have ATo, but we don't always get dealt good hands.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
its obv better to have ATo, but we don't always get dealt good hands. [/ QUOTE ] i don't think this is obvious at all considering that many villains do not fold or 4 bet AJ, AQ, and AK pf |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AT has more value then 96o, stop thinking about only pessimistic scenarios (being dominated in this case). Weigh up the advantages and disadvantages. AT is clearly better then 96o.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
AT has more value then 96o, stop thinking about only pessimistic scenarios (being dominated in this case). Weigh up the advantages and disadvantages. AT is clearly better then 96o. [/ QUOTE ] thinking about your kicker isn't pessimistic and if villain has a pocket pair, you will not stack them with a pair of Aces, but you can stack them w a 2p or str8 from 96 i actually honestly don't know which hand is better in a re raised pot vs various types of villains |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
list the advantages
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
list the advantages [/ QUOTE ] i just did, w/ 96 your 2 pairs are more deceptive and so likelier to stack villain 96 makes more str8 than AT a pair of Aces w AT in a rred pot is not gonna stack KK-22 i think it really depends upon what hands the villain is willing to stack off with, because usually you're taking the pot down w/o showdown |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll leave it to someone else to do the math for the cbet but I don't think it's spew.
Depends on his calling range ldo and how much of it includes an A. Edit: blah let's do a quick run: (1+2/3)X = 1 5/3X = 1 X = 3/5 = 60% If villain calls < 60% the cbet is autoprofit. 16 hands make up Ax, 6 a pair so with the very simplistic assumption that he'll play on with any A or set and we won't invest any more money he needs a range that consists of > 40% hands that don't fit that discription. 77-QQ;AQ;AJ = 32 Ax hands, 36 pair hands = profitable (for some range that I pulled out of my behind) So: tl;dr Imo pf3bet is profitable + cbet is profitable = no spew |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you make it a 4x raise and have that be the last money you put into the pot, it's instantly +EV against this type of player, if used like once per session. If that were the case, we'd obv want 96o instead of ATo. The fact that you cbet this flop obviously changes things though... We'd definitely rather have top pair than no pair. But if you think about it, if you plan on cbetting the flop, does it really matter since he won't call you on this drawless flop with worse than AT? You might as well be bluffing. So in conclusion I think all that matters is how much of his range is worse than AQ/AK/AA/KK, and your hand is irrelevant.
|
![]() |
|
|