200NL - Bit confused in 3bet pot

[Mossberg]

fwiw c/c isn't good here either imo because it commits us, and we can't really expect this type of player to be turning marginal hands into a bluff often enough. Most likely, he will gladly check back the worse pairs in his range and play for pot control.

[jk3a]

c/f, bet river if checked through

[AlanDyer]

i'd bet again on the turn, it's the cheapest option and quite a scary one

[Moemar]

[ QUOTE ]
i'd bet again on the turn, it's the cheapest option and quite a scary one

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't mind this option, as c/c let's him set the bet size.

How much you bettin on the turn?

[Mossberg]

[ QUOTE ]
i'd bet again on the turn, it's the cheapest option and quite a scary one

[/ QUOTE ]

great reasoning imo.

[spivey]

I like c/f.

[orange]

convert please.

it depends what you think he's capable of here. if he would turn a made hand into a bluff here (ie. something like 88), i dont mind c/c-ing anything here.

he shouldnt really ever have AK. KK i think checks behind a ton as does JJ but as stated, i dont think that him bluffing is outside the realm of possibilities. if he's capabable of floating here on the flop, i heavily consider playing for stacks if he bets.

but, if he's a cookie cutter and won't show up with anything aside from AA/KK/Ax[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]/etc then you can c/f.

[willw9]

As played, I checked and he bet $86.

Hero?

If we call, how are we responding to a shove on a blank river (6-8 imo)?

[clowntable]

Pretty villain dependant (call 3bet range, floating in 3bet pots IP). Given that we hold QQ I'd sat AQ can be discounted. Dunno if he calls AJ here though.
If he hasn't shown a tendency of floating overs in position in 3bet pots I don't expect him to have an A here often.

So usually this is a c/c to get value from 99-JJ for me.

And yeah 40ish bet on the flop pls.