|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
Their limping range is much wider than their raising range, obv you have to raise their limps w a wider range
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
[ QUOTE ]
Their limping range is much wider than their raising range, obv you have to raise their limps w a wider range [/ QUOTE ] okay what if it is 2 different people: one limps every hand he plays, one raises every hand he plays what then? also for me my raise range = atc, my limp range = junk vs passive fish |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
I prefer not to raise wide OOP, bloats the pot.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
[ QUOTE ]
I prefer not to raise wide OOP, bloats the pot. [/ QUOTE ] sometimes that is a good thing, isn't it? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
[ QUOTE ]
I prefer not to raise wide OOP, bloats the pot. [/ QUOTE ] When you're OOP you welcome a bloated pot |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I prefer not to raise wide OOP, bloats the pot. [/ QUOTE ] When you're OOP you welcome a bloated pot [/ QUOTE ] Could you explain this [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I prefer not to raise wide OOP, bloats the pot. [/ QUOTE ] When you're OOP you welcome a bloated pot [/ QUOTE ] Could you explain this [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yeah this is not intuitive at all. But both creed and cwar seems to agree on it so I'm not going to dismiss the idea just yet. Forgive me if I am misinterpreting y'alls posts. Read Going beyond jam/fold. Creed's explanation is pretty good. http://twoplustwo.com/magazine/issue35/bush1107.html No explanation, but same idea (I think). http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post12916655 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising limpers vs 3betting
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I prefer not to raise wide OOP, bloats the pot. [/ QUOTE ] When you're OOP you welcome a bloated pot [/ QUOTE ] Could you explain this [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] The more money you have behind, the more villain can use position. Think about the extreme case where you get allin OOP. That's a super bloated pot, and that favors you. Now think about the case where you raise enough so that you have one pot-sized bet left. Again, this is good for you: you bet the flop, and you're done. Or you check/fold if you want. Either way, opponent's really not able to use position properly. About the only time that bloating becomes a serious concern is when, post-reraise, there's >3 pot-sized bets left. Then it can get tricky. But in 100 BB games, that's not gonna be the case. |
|
|