#1
|
|||
|
|||
stars payout structure
hey I was just wondering if anyone knows why Stars pays the 2nd last table (10-18) all the same while most other sites pay 3 different prizes for that table.
Is there a reason behind it? thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
Have you thought about e-mailing them?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
is it your goal to get 11th in many tournaments?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
no but when i do i think i deserve more than 18th
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
Your information is incorrect.
Stars 20% tournaments differentiate between 10 - 13 and 14 - 18. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
ya but those tourneys are awful
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
The money has to come from somewhere and that means less for first. I personally really like having a big jump in pay from 10th to 9th. It's easier to abuse the FT bubble.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
"most" sites are flat from 10-18 actually.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
I think first and second should both be half as much and then more than 2 people could actually make some money.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stars payout structure
[ QUOTE ]
I think first and second should both be half as much and then more than 2 people could actually make some money. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think many people here will agree with you. Play to win is the motto, so getting as much money possible for a win is the preference. I'm not sure where I stand - I've yet to win a 'big field' MTT. My best is 3rd in a $3+r, but I have hit a few FT's. So a flatter payout structure would have been better for me results-wise. But I'm a hobby player, not a grinder. Stars has the 20% payout structure to appeal to the fish -> let more of them cash, so more of them come back. I was surprised, however, at the FT payout structure for the sunday 100k. I figured it would be a flatter structure than it is. Are there any other arguments against a flatter structure, other than "I'm the best player, I expect to win, so I want most of the money to be for 1st place". I don't really buy that argument - there are too many chops in big tourneys to believe that's the case. Take for example the Sunday 100k structure from last week. Here it is with a flatter structure too. What are the pros and cons of this type of flat FT structure? (I'm by no means advocating this structure - just want a better discussion than the usual "I'm the best, so make 1st 100%" argument that I usually read.) |
|
|