#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
I just called his river bet.
He tabled an 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Drunk Swami=negative EV |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
Go Swami!!!!!!!!!!!
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
[ QUOTE ]
I just called his river bet. He tabled an 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Drunk Swami=negative EV [/ QUOTE ] for what its worth the last time I played with Swami regularly was more than a year ago when he went on the wagon, he would never raise a flop with an A if he has nothing but a flushdraw after someone donked into the field, he was too weak-passive. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I just called his river bet. He tabled an 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Drunk Swami=negative EV [/ QUOTE ] for what its worth the last time I played with Swami regularly was more than a year ago when he went on the wagon, he would never raise a flop with an A if he has nothing but a flushdraw after someone donked into the field, he was too weak-passive. [/ QUOTE ] His hand ranges open up when he's loaded, as well as much more aggressive style emerging. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
lol Swami isn't betting this river with AK. At least not sober. He's the type of guy that autochecks AK/AA on the river because "the hand is over."
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
Poker beer muscles. Interesting.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
[ QUOTE ]
including a very drunk Swami who likes to raise on the button. [/ QUOTE ] even bigger reason to muck preflop. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
Why are you checking the river? I Bet/call 100% of the time here
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
[ QUOTE ]
Why are you checking the river? I Bet/call 100% of the time here [/ QUOTE ] Because I rethought my strategy of a check/raise. I had to consider that he was in fact drawing to the flush. If he held a set, he would have reraised me again on the turn. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
[/ QUOTE ] "If he held a set, he would have reraised me again on the turn." [/ QUOTE ] If he had a set, he SHOULD have reraised, but w/4 straight cards on the board and the fd, it is unlikely. Drunk or sober, he won't 3bet unless he's 90% sure he's winning the pot. |
|
|