![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Ever schmoked the sticky icky? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
480 | 77.80% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
137 | 22.20% |
Voters: 617. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone increase the number of buyins for every level they move up? Not a huge jump but at least a few buyins to pad the expected skill increase. Or is this type of thing already considered in the math? [/ QUOTE ] There are 2 reasons why people with very aggressive bankroll-strategies have higher buy-in requirements the higher they play: 1) On higher levels the money starts becoming more important to them, and they realize they would play scared with few buy-ins. 2) The higher they play, the lower their winrate is and the more buy-ins are recommended by the Kelly criterion. [ QUOTE ] whatever you say, 10 buyins isnt good, u will go busto someday [/ QUOTE ] If you play with the number of buy-ins the Kelly criterion tells you to, you won“t go busto even if Kelly recommends 7 buy-ins at some stages. If you take money out of the bankroll, then you get a risk of ruin when using the Kelly criterion. |
|
|