Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: 10k Monitor fight yo??!??!!!!!??!!!111??!!!
Dell, obv 5 9.09%
Lizard, obv 12 21.82%
Monitor on Monitor action is HAWT 8 14.55%
This may be the most retarded thing I've ever seen on 2p2. Ever. 17 30.91%
BASTARD 13 23.64%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:27 PM
The Bus Driver The Bus Driver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Taking you to school
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

[ QUOTE ]
As a person who knows nothing about marriage, I don't understand the whole engagement ring + wedding ring thing, is the grossly expensive engagement ring like just for show while you're engaged and then you like put in in a box or something? The one my mom wore I guess like fit together as a 2-piece set but I get the impression this is not the norm.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is the norm. The "norm" is for the engagement ring to be the big showy ring. Then you get a band that may or may not also be showy, but typically not a big rock like the engagement ring. It'll usually be just a band or a band with some small diamonds in it. Also somewhat common is the engagement ring will be a solitary with just one large diamond and then the wedding band is made to match and has maybe two or four somewhat large (but still smaller than the engagement diamond) diamonds that sit on either side of the engagement diamond. Then, she wears them both after the wedding. Many women weld the two together and make it essentially one ring. Many (my wife included) keep them separate, but wear them both on their left ring finger, like a ring that's just two pieces. In either case, in more detail, tradition is that the wedding band goes on first so it's nearer the base of her finger - except on the wedding day, of course, when the engagement ring is already on her finger and then she puts on the wedding band during the ceremony.

To those saying it's "sad" for the woman's engagement ring to be that much more expensive than the man's wedding band: I don't think it really is. The implication is that it's some hugely wasteful expenditure on some silly ring that doesn't really mean anything and is just a sign of people caught up in the "wrong" things or in being materialistic, etc. That's not necessarily true. While there are a lot of women who are indeed caught up entirely too much in the size of the rock or in the trivialities of the wedding process, to just dismiss those who spend a lot on the engagement ring as "sad" is somewhat sad in itself.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:53 PM
SoloAJ SoloAJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois State
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

TBD,

I am appreciative of your post as I wasn't entirely sure about all of the things you mentioned. It turns out I was right about them, but was really quite unsure.

I am still unsure as to how I feel about the whole "expensive ring" aspect of it. I get the feeling that the type of woman I'll someday marry won't view an expensive ring as a necessity. Nor will she be truly saddened if I didn't get her one (whether being open or hidden about that).

That, of course, doesn't mean that I won't be getting a fancy ring. Shrug. I have more important issues to worry about concerning marriage than the ring. I figure if I can hurdle all of the other obstacles--like finding a woman--then the ring problem will solve itself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:56 PM
The Bus Driver The Bus Driver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Taking you to school
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

[ QUOTE ]
TBD,

I am appreciative of your post as I wasn't entirely sure about all of the things you mentioned. It turns out I was right about them, but was really quite unsure.

I am still unsure as to how I feel about the whole "expensive ring" aspect of it. I get the feeling that the type of woman I'll someday marry won't view an expensive ring as a necessity. Nor will she be truly saddened if I didn't get her one (whether being open or hidden about that).

That, of course, doesn't mean that I won't be getting a fancy ring. Shrug. I have more important issues to worry about concerning marriage than the ring. I figure if I can hurdle all of the other obstacles--like finding a woman--then the ring problem will solve itself.

[/ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't worry about whether or not you're going to be getting her a big huge ring or any ring at all. It'll sort itself out. If you're a big fancy ring kind of person, fine. If you're not, that's fine too. I'm pretty sure that if she's going to marry you for the right reasons, the ring isn't going to be an issue one way or another and she'll love it either way (unless you're stupid about it and buy way more than you can afford).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:13 PM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: February made me shiver
Posts: 9,200
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

I got this cheesy "World Player" magazine somehow (I think Royal Vegas sent it to me when I used to play there, just started coming one day). There was a two page article on the African diamond trade in there one time, and I got my wife to read it. Now she does not want mne to buy her any diamonds. In business school, they call this goal congruence.

My number is between 1 and 9 (She read the thing a while after we were married, but didn't mind a reasonably priced engagement ring).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:15 PM
XXXNoahXXX XXXNoahXXX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 8,159
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

fnord,

wait til she finds out about canadian diamonds [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:19 PM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: February made me shiver
Posts: 9,200
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

[ QUOTE ]
fnord,

wait til she finds out about canadian diamonds [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, she doesn't mind the stuff made in labs. Also, damn Canadians!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2007, 09:40 PM
Death Valley Death Valley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,617
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

Mine was less than 100th but thats because I got a great deal on my ring this ring was $50 incl s/h eBay
an her set was about $8000 . The same ring was in the mall for 280-350. eBay rocks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:18 PM
The Bus Driver The Bus Driver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Taking you to school
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

[ QUOTE ]
I got this cheesy "World Player" magazine somehow (I think Royal Vegas sent it to me when I used to play there, just started coming one day). There was a two page article on the African diamond trade in there one time, and I got my wife to read it. Now she does not want mne to buy her any diamonds. In business school, they call this goal congruence.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you want to keep this up and find her waning on this, rent/netflix Blood Diamond. It's a pretty good movie, so you might want to see it anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:15 PM
The Bus Driver The Bus Driver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Taking you to school
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As a person who knows nothing about marriage, I don't understand the whole engagement ring + wedding ring thing, is the grossly expensive engagement ring like just for show while you're engaged and then you like put in in a box or something? The one my mom wore I guess like fit together as a 2-piece set but I get the impression this is not the norm.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is the norm. The "norm" is for the engagement ring to be the big showy ring. Then you get a band that may or may not also be showy, but typically not a big rock like the engagement ring. It'll usually be just a band or a band with some small diamonds in it. Also somewhat common is the engagement ring will be a solitary with just one large diamond and then the wedding band is made to match and has maybe two or four somewhat large (but still smaller than the engagement diamond) diamonds that sit on either side of the engagement diamond. Then, she wears them both after the wedding. Many women weld the two together and make it essentially one ring. Many (my wife included) keep them separate, but wear them both on their left ring finger, like a ring that's just two pieces. In either case, in more detail, tradition is that the wedding band goes on first so it's nearer the base of her finger - except on the wedding day, of course, when the engagement ring is already on her finger and then she puts on the wedding band during the ceremony.

To those saying it's "sad" for the woman's engagement ring to be that much more expensive than the man's wedding band: I don't think it really is. The implication is that it's some hugely wasteful expenditure on some silly ring that doesn't really mean anything and is just a sign of people caught up in the "wrong" things or in being materialistic, etc. That's not necessarily true. While there are a lot of women who are indeed caught up entirely too much in the size of the rock or in the trivialities of the wedding process, to just dismiss those who spend a lot on the engagement ring as "sad" is somewhat sad in itself.

[/ QUOTE ]
Back to the part about women wearing both rings on their left finger and then they're either welded together or kept loose as two rings. My wife has kept her rings separate. As a practical matter, I think this is the way to go. She's athletic and active. When she's being active or is doing something where she's worried that she could damage or muck up her engagement ring, she can leave that at home and still wear the wedding band without having to worry too much about losing or damaging the pretty expensive engagement ring. It's also a good idea to leave the big showy engagement ring at home when we travel abroad. Having the rings separate means she can still wear her wedding band without attracting too much attention to a huge diamond on her finger.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.