Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

[Hercules]

Fwiw, its actually allowed what Krantz, White and fwf are doing.
On the other hand i dunno if i would like it, if i was tie.
But u know, its online poker, gotta see this more pragmatic instead of starting big [censored] ethical discussions.

Lee Jones once said on his blog something - imo very interesting - about unenforcable rules.
If i would have a problem with that kind of stuff fwf and co are "accused" of, i´d just stop playing online.
Everybody basically knows whats going on.

It would be a very different story if tie asked fwf who he is playing. But well,tbh, even then i wouldnt trust some online person, when there are a few hundo k´s on the line

Edit: And btw, i agree very much with curtains. I do not see that big of an advantage

[imabigdeal]

while i think it might be borderline unethical, i couldn't care less if the situation was similar to what happened, i.e. some vv good players teaming up, playing on one of their OWN accts. now say the acct was of a known fish, a big loser, and that he had agreed with two vv good players to team up and play together. THAT would be [censored] up obv, bc you're not playing the fish you thought, but the fish and two experts (who would undoubtedly be making all the decisions). i realize however a situation like this hasn't happened yet (that we know about). fwiw i would hate playing on a "team" personally, as no two players have the EXACT same playing style and i could see some big disagreements in some pretty big pots. that's not good.

[cowpig]

[ QUOTE ]
while i think it might be borderline unethical, i couldn't care less if the situation was similar to what happened, i.e. some vv good players teaming up, playing on one of their OWN accts. now say the acct was of a known fish, a big loser, and that he had agreed with two vv good players to team up and play together. THAT would be [censored] up obv, bc you're not playing the fish you thought, but the fish and two experts (who would undoubtedly be making all the decisions). i realize however a situation like this hasn't happened yet (that we know about). fwiw i would hate playing on a "team" personally, as no two players have the EXACT same playing style and i could see some big disagreements in some pretty big pots. that's not good.

[/ QUOTE ]

This does happen. Except with just one expert instead of two experts and the fish on the account.

[cbloom]

It's totally unethical, just like cheating on your taxes, and just about everyone who's successful is unethical.

[lapoker17]

[ QUOTE ]
just about everyone who's successful is unethical.


[/ QUOTE ]

jesus. so dumb.

[Poseidon65]

This is the worst thread ever.

[captZEEbo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
just about everyone who's successful is unethical.


[/ QUOTE ]

jesus. so dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]yeah, probably the opposite is true tbh

[snowbank]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
just about everyone who's successful is unethical.


[/ QUOTE ]

jesus. so dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]yeah, probably the opposite is true tbh

[/ QUOTE ]

ya, i heard jesus was smart too.

[terrible]

[ QUOTE ]
It's totally unethical, just like cheating on your taxes, and just about everyone who's successful is unethical.

[/ QUOTE ]

haha, so true.

[Statutory]

Long been established there is no one player per hand rule online.

Coaching is so standard nowadays, real time sweat is a great learning tool. I frequently chop action with a friend and talk strategy for an hour session.