![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
WTF How aren't these both snap calls? #2 is a typical squeeze spot, and you are considering folding AK for 110bb vs a reg? SNAAAAAAP call it all day. [/ QUOTE ] I have TT in #2 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] WTF How aren't these both snap calls? #2 is a typical squeeze spot, and you are considering folding AK for 110bb vs a reg? SNAAAAAAP call it all day. [/ QUOTE ] I have TT in #2 [/ QUOTE ] ok, my bad. I'd prob just call pf, i like to polarise my range here. I'd stack off with JJ for sure, TT is tough. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hand 1 i call hand 2 i fold against this villain
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hand 2 is a pretty std fold imo.
hand 1 is a little tougher, depends how solid UTG is because that determines if SB would resqueeze light. If UTG is pretty aggro i'd stack with AK here. If not I might fold it esp if I haven't seen SB getting out of line recently. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snap call 1.
2 is a fold |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hand one is much closer than people are making it out to be. His range is probably TT+/AK or something, haven't done the math but calling is probably neutral EV. I still call because it's basically a 0 EV spot and calling is good for meta.
Hand 2 is also very borderline. A case could be made for calling and folding, but I'd personally lean towards calling. |
![]() |
|
|