|
|
|
|
#1
11-11-2007, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mason... Sir,
<<<It should be evident that TE, who has indeed worked very hard, has done that hard work not for the direct benefit of 2p2 as a commercial entity, but for the benefit of the PPA.>>>>
Do you really believe this? You sincerely believe that The Engineer has done all the work he has done over the last year simply for the benefit of the PPA as an organization? Ah. . .the good ole days have returned. Every "last post" in every thread in this forum belongs to BluffThis again. . . and they all say basically the same thing. Les 
|
|
#2
11-11-2007, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
Bluff,
Only recently did TE become involved with the PPA. I believe your point about all his hard work to be for the benefit of the PPA to be incorrect. Thats not the point of this thread. We can agree to disagree on this also, but I simply believe in not cutting your nose off despite your face.
|
|
#3
11-11-2007, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
[ QUOTE ]
Do you really believe this? You sincerely believe that The Engineer has done all the work he has done over the last year simply for the benefit of the PPA as an organization? [/ QUOTE ] You mean he really has been working to up page views so Mason makes more from his advertisers? Wow, Mason sure is an ingrate!
|
|
#4
11-11-2007, 01:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Do you really believe this? You sincerely believe that The Engineer has done all the work he has done over the last year simply for the benefit of the PPA as an organization? [/ QUOTE ] You mean he really has been working to up page views so Mason makes more from his advertisers? Wow, Mason sure is an ingrate! [/ QUOTE ] Nor did I ever make such an assertion, Bluff. You may have a bazillion posts and you may be witty in your belittling of Tuff Fish, but neither of these facts make your arguments any more valid. Les
|
|
#5
11-11-2007, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
Les, I'm glad you pointed that out because I totally agree with you.
Whatever one may think of the PPA or such, lord knows Engineer has been working hard for poker players for a year--well before ever considering getting involved with the PPA. Bluff can make some good points, but he's way off on this one.
|
|
#6
11-11-2007, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
[ QUOTE ]
<<<It should be evident that TE, who has indeed worked very hard, has done that hard work not for the direct benefit of 2p2 as a commercial entity, but for the benefit of the PPA.>>>> Do you really believe this? You sincerely believe that The Engineer has done all the work he has done over the last year simply for the benefit of the PPA as an organization? Ah. . .the good ole days have returned. Every "last post" in every thread in this forum belongs to BluffThis again. . . and they all say basically the same thing. Les [/ QUOTE ] Les, I thank you and everyone else who was with me. My only goal has been to get all poker legalized everywhere. Everyone: This will be my last post on this forum for a while. I really don't need this. Besides, we're progressed beyond where we were a few months ago. I'll be at the PPA forum sometimes, at http://webringamerica.com/4/pokerpla...wforum.php?f=2 . Take care all, TE
|
|
#7
11-11-2007, 01:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] <<<It should be evident that TE, who has indeed worked very hard, has done that hard work not for the direct benefit of 2p2 as a commercial entity, but for the benefit of the PPA.>>>> Do you really believe this? You sincerely believe that The Engineer has done all the work he has done over the last year simply for the benefit of the PPA as an organization? Ah. . .the good ole days have returned. Every "last post" in every thread in this forum belongs to BluffThis again. . . and they all say basically the same thing. Les [/ QUOTE ] Les, I thank you and everyone else who was with me. My only goal has been to get all poker legalized everywhere. Everyone: This will be my last post on this forum for a while. I really don't need this. Besides, we're progressed beyond where we were a few months ago. I'll be at the PPA forum sometimes, at http://webringamerica.com/4/pokerpla...wforum.php?f=2 . Take care all, TE [/ QUOTE ] Nice job showing everyone who the boss is, Mason. NH, WP, etc. Les
|
|
#8
11-11-2007, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
Bluffthis, I just do not understand what interests or goals that Mrs. Shulman and other members of the board of directors have that will not benefit my interests as an online poker player or will harm my such interests. Please clarify your concerns with specific interests of such board members that you feel conflict with online poker players.
|
|
#9
11-11-2007, 02:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
[ QUOTE ]
Bluffthis, I just do not understand what interests or goals that Mrs. Shulman and other members of the board of directors have that will not benefit my interests as an online poker player or will harm my such interests. Please clarify your concerns with specific interests of such board members that you feel conflict with online poker players. [/ QUOTE ] What I Would Like to See From the PPA (and 2+2) Should 2+2 endorse PPA? PPA Update. Which Groups *DO NOT* Deserve a Seat on the PPA Board?
|
|
#10
11-11-2007, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mason... Sir,
Thanks Mason!
I see this is quite helpful in our fight to legalize poker. Maybe we should split the fight up into High Stakes Players of 2+2, Medium, Low, and then PPA members. No one can be a part of both groups. IMO, 2+2's stubbornness on this issue is not needed and this little contest is a great way to divide a good cause. Especially making it a public issue as well. I hope eventually you(2+2) can handle this "situation" in an adult like manner.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
