#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
I guess the standard reply is Sit and go bogey1.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
no the standard reply is Omaha 8/b.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
believe it or not... NLHE, the way it is played today, is probably one of the lowest variance games.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
I beat .5/1 for my first 10k hands and broke even for the next 20k hands.
I refuse to believe I got worse in omaha. I blame variance. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
believe it or not... NLHE, the way it is played today, is probably one of the lowest variance games. [/ QUOTE ] ding ding, winnar, unless you can find some 50BB max buyin pot-limit games. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
believe it or not... NLHE, the way it is played today, is probably one of the lowest variance games. [/ QUOTE ] this is really only half true. while the variance in nlh is fairly low, the very small winrates posted even by excellent players lead to some really monster swings. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
believe it or not... NLHE, the way it is played today, is probably one of the lowest variance games. [/ QUOTE ] 2 years ago, probably yes, today, probably no. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
Adding to the good comments here. Even with a lot of hands played e.g. 100k, your next month of results will not very likely mirror your historical winrate.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Samplesize for Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
Try blackjack to lower variance. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|